From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 2002:adf:a111:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o17-v6csp5323231wro; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 02:18:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cuSYz1DdBGnk3H+PB998T2YpTFpqaSpG2Tfq1rVhmTWJEY1xJnrk04QgNVC3J5J1KzeJBK X-Received: by 2002:a37:455:: with SMTP id 82mr15285600qke.60.1540891123644; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 02:18:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540891123; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FJvt7n0ctirzZoE1doh9GkZkVLqTEke4p21GyusM1azoRWC9bouIs/kATQJNvC7EPA FHIfu/Ogq64YXmP4V+TUeG0IYLEUk4Jlr78sP/cqX1hq7bJkqecL4GDKXYTeeH7Ats4z yY7/+A2MCc6Ytw4pUYf07j35UxFhXQMeHvUbIoakH7Os2neuFdyGAIyhEwgBq748JI/e 8siq5UdHaHCVvBZtjE5t+8oXd7MsjuZdFEabgBnTM4U3Rd/HYjR0pQdGuHjUOVUn8QwF ZGsLnN9jYivT2+zKdPQfEgyWf7Qh4YDd90PtCOhDn8n990J9acp8v/zXYfF5o5D76lAT uhoQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:cc:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:to:from; bh=3Mqeif6UrEyTcDXScwKFkQKGVJgbn7wuK1Sfm7VxIfw=; b=CB4n1YwLdH4Cm/6kQDdRg15MJCi2stEUOpNaKmknFWS6TpQsUyGgWIDtdwByeQ/jtJ 9/gdFmvaW/aJKfWObbB2DcfAWI3FgVKZ4WS7KvGiXLwrBO/1Vyu+G+PkqSKWmkZFqHlX IQ5wli4UG4+rjqoKgnJXuL4qJvSYvXCsdAv91zEf1qnEJ2/dEndR2mrs9oZ5em8ogXlN DVyRMsGpXRNXWwX7ZLEapjUFbBcQ0INs/D5+zEi2kZSKan1EqzlDER9N5F2WtSsU2kOE R/HQdyaP16K8JY7fpITtXvMbIbZeLiPXlF5eKuVqGOzgemxtAYP4VcaSAe0MyzC+mwwK zCKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b2-v6si9295075qtj.219.2018.10.30.02.18.43 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 02:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from localhost ([::1]:51746 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHQAd-0008UE-65 for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:18:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHQ9x-0007KW-CV for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:18:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHQ9r-0000d1-D6 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:18:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHQ9r-0000c2-6I; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:17:55 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07DE308A94C; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-117-34.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2B92A2C7; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B9A0C11385F2; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:17:51 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Guenter Roeck References: <1540548409-22560-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <7fc49925-36ff-bd9a-0cd7-e5f8d4bb3672@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:17:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Guenter Roeck's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:09:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87pnvriyio.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:17:53 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate the "collie" machine and Strongarm devices X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , qemu-arm , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: myTwnTupz/hH Guenter Roeck writes: > On 10/29/18 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 27 October 2018 at 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 10/26/18 3:12 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> Hi Guenter; there's a proposal here to deprecate (and eventually >>>> remove) the 'collie' board (strongarm) from QEMU. Is that one of >>>> the ones you're currently using in your automated testing of Linux >>>> kernels on QEMU? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. I can run the test with older versions of qemu, so it is ok for me >>> if it is removed (as long as that removal is not backported). >> >> Mmm, but if we have an active user who's testing them then they >> probably shouldn't be in the frontline of boards to remove. >> Which other boards do you test with mainline QEMU? >> > > For arm: > > akita > ast2500-evb > beagle > beaglexm > borzoi > collie > cubieboard > imx25-pdk > integratorcp > kzm > mainstone > midway > mps2-an385 > overo > palmetto-bmc > raspi2 > realview-eb > realview-eb-mpcore > realview-pb-a8 > realview-pbx-a9 > romulus-bmc > sabrelite > smdkc210 > spitz > terrier > tosa > versatileab > versatilepb > vexpress-a15 > vexpress-a15-a7 > vexpress-a9 > witherspoon-bmc > xilinx-zynq-a9 > z2 > > Though not all of them are supported by upstream qemu. For some of them I carry local patches, > for others I use out-of-tree versions of qemu (beagle/beaglexm). Would it be possible to get useful parts of your automated testing into upstream QEMU's CI? I'm asking because I think we should require at least a smoke test in CI for all machine types, and drop the ones that lack it. Not today, but in the not-too-distant future. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHQAG-0007nT-Al for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:18:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHQA4-0000pE-OF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:18:17 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1540548409-22560-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <7fc49925-36ff-bd9a-0cd7-e5f8d4bb3672@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:17:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Guenter Roeck's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:09:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87pnvriyio.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate the "collie" machine and Strongarm devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , qemu-arm , QEMU Developers Guenter Roeck writes: > On 10/29/18 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 27 October 2018 at 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 10/26/18 3:12 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> Hi Guenter; there's a proposal here to deprecate (and eventually >>>> remove) the 'collie' board (strongarm) from QEMU. Is that one of >>>> the ones you're currently using in your automated testing of Linux >>>> kernels on QEMU? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. I can run the test with older versions of qemu, so it is ok for me >>> if it is removed (as long as that removal is not backported). >> >> Mmm, but if we have an active user who's testing them then they >> probably shouldn't be in the frontline of boards to remove. >> Which other boards do you test with mainline QEMU? >> > > For arm: > > akita > ast2500-evb > beagle > beaglexm > borzoi > collie > cubieboard > imx25-pdk > integratorcp > kzm > mainstone > midway > mps2-an385 > overo > palmetto-bmc > raspi2 > realview-eb > realview-eb-mpcore > realview-pb-a8 > realview-pbx-a9 > romulus-bmc > sabrelite > smdkc210 > spitz > terrier > tosa > versatileab > versatilepb > vexpress-a15 > vexpress-a15-a7 > vexpress-a9 > witherspoon-bmc > xilinx-zynq-a9 > z2 > > Though not all of them are supported by upstream qemu. For some of them I carry local patches, > for others I use out-of-tree versions of qemu (beagle/beaglexm). Would it be possible to get useful parts of your automated testing into upstream QEMU's CI? I'm asking because I think we should require at least a smoke test in CI for all machine types, and drop the ones that lack it. Not today, but in the not-too-distant future.