From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: create new workqueue for object destruction
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 14:57:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87po92veg5.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c34d2d7f-2740-365f-85e4-7ec9c9c66f1a@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7364 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 30 2017, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
> On 10/29/2017 11:18 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 27 2017, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/23/2017 01:31 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 20 2017, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/20/2017 12:28 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19 2017, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/19/2017 12:36 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 18 2017, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/18/2017 09:29 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 17 2017, Shaohua Li wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:04:52PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> lockdep currently complains about a potential deadlock
>>>>>>>>>>>> with sysfs access taking reconfig_mutex, and that
>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting for a work queue to complete.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The cause is inappropriate overloading of work-items
>>>>>>>>>>>> on work-queues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We currently have two work-queues: md_wq and md_misc_wq.
>>>>>>>>>>>> They service 5 different tasks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mddev->flush_work md_wq
>>>>>>>>>>>> mddev->event_work (for dm-raid) md_misc_wq
>>>>>>>>>>>> mddev->del_work (mddev_delayed_delete) md_misc_wq
>>>>>>>>>>>> mddev->del_work (md_start_sync) md_misc_wq
>>>>>>>>>>>> rdev->del_work md_misc_wq
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We need to call flush_workqueue() for md_start_sync and ->event_work
>>>>>>>>>>>> while holding reconfig_mutex, but mustn't hold it when
>>>>>>>>>>>> flushing mddev_delayed_delete or rdev->del_work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> md_wq is a bit special as it has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM so it is
>>>>>>>>>>>> best to leave that alone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So create a new workqueue, md_del_wq, and a new work_struct,
>>>>>>>>>>>> mddev->sync_work, so we can keep two classes of work separate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> md_del_wq and ->del_work are used only for destroying rdev
>>>>>>>>>>>> and mddev.
>>>>>>>>>>>> md_misc_wq is used for event_work and sync_work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also document the purpose of each flush_workqueue() call.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This removes the lockdep warning.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I had the exactly same patch queued internally,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cool :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> but the mdadm test suite still
>>>>>>>>>>> shows lockdep warnning. I haven't time to check further.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The only other lockdep I've seen later was some ext4 thing, though I
>>>>>>>>>> haven't tried the full test suite. I might have a look tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm also seeing a lockdep warning with or without this patch,
>>>>>>>>> reproducible with:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>> Looks like using one workqueue for mddev->del_work and rdev->del_work
>>>>>>>> causes problems.
>>>>>>>> Can you try with this addition please?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It helped for that case but now there is another warning triggered by:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> export IMSM_NO_PLATFORM=1 # for platforms without IMSM
>>>>>>> mdadm -C /dev/md/imsm0 -eimsm -n4 /dev/sd[a-d] -R
>>>>>>> mdadm -C /dev/md/vol0 -l5 -n4 /dev/sd[a-d] -R --assume-clean
>>>>>>> mdadm -If sda
>>>>>>> mdadm -a /dev/md127 /dev/sda
>>>>>>> mdadm -Ss
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried that ... and mdmon gets a SIGSEGV.
>>>>>> imsm_set_disk() calls get_imsm_disk() and gets a NULL back.
>>>>>> It then passes the NULL to mark_failure() and that dereferences it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting... I can't reproduce this. Can you show the output from
>>>>> mdadm -E for all disks after mdmon crashes? And maybe a debug log from
>>>>> mdmon?
>>>>
>>>> The crash happens when I run "mdadm -If sda".
>>>> gdb tell me:
>>>>
>>>> Thread 2 "mdmon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>> [Switching to Thread 0x7f5526c24700 (LWP 4757)]
>>>> 0x000000000041601c in is_failed (disk=0x0) at super-intel.c:1324
>>>> 1324 return (disk->status & FAILED_DISK) == FAILED_DISK;
>>>> (gdb) where
>>>> #0 0x000000000041601c in is_failed (disk=0x0) at super-intel.c:1324
>>>> #1 0x00000000004255a2 in mark_failure (super=0x65fa30, dev=0x660ba0,
>>>> disk=0x0, idx=0) at super-intel.c:7973
>>>> #2 0x00000000004260e8 in imsm_set_disk (a=0x6635d0, n=0, state=17)
>>>> at super-intel.c:8357
>>>> #3 0x0000000000405069 in read_and_act (a=0x6635d0, fds=0x7f5526c23e10)
>>>> at monitor.c:551
>>>> #4 0x0000000000405c8e in wait_and_act (container=0x65f010, nowait=0)
>>>> at monitor.c:875
>>>> #5 0x0000000000405dc7 in do_monitor (container=0x65f010) at monitor.c:906
>>>> #6 0x0000000000403037 in run_child (v=0x65f010) at mdmon.c:85
>>>> #7 0x00007f5526fcb494 in start_thread (arg=0x7f5526c24700)
>>>> at pthread_create.c:333
>>>> #8 0x00007f5526d0daff in clone ()
>>>> at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:97
>>>>
>>>> The super-disks list that get_imsm_dl_disk() looks through contains
>>>> sdc, sdd, sde, but not sda - so get_imsm_disk() returns NULL.
>>>> (the 4 devices I use are sda sdc sde sde).
>>>> mdadm --examine of sda and sdc after the crash are below.
>>>> mdmon debug output is below that.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the information. The metadata output shows that there is
>>> something wrong with sda. Is there anything different about this device?
>>> The other disks are 10M QEMU SCSI drives, is sda the same? Can you
>>> check its serial e.g. with sg_inq?
>>
>> sdc, sdd, and sde are specified to qemu with
>>
>> -hdb /var/tmp/mdtest10 \
>> -hdc /var/tmp/mdtest11 \
>> -hdd /var/tmp/mdtest12 \
>>
>> sda comes from
>> -drive file=/var/tmp/mdtest13,if=scsi,index=3,media=disk -s
>>
>> /var/tmp/mdtest* are simple raw images, 10M each.
>>
>> sg_inq report sd[cde] as
>> Vendor: ATA
>> Product: QEMU HARDDISK
>> Serial: QM0000[234]
>>
>> sda is
>> Vendor: QEMU
>> Product: QEMU HARDDISK
>> no serial number.
>>
>>
>> If I change my script to use
>> -drive file=/var/tmp/mdtest13,if=scsi,index=3,serial=QM00009,media=disk -s
>>
>> for sda, mdmon doesn't crash. It may well be reasonable to refuse to
>> work with a device that has no serial number. It is not very friendly
>> to crash :-(
>
> OK, this explains a lot. Can you try the same with this patch? It looks
> like there was insufficient error checking when retrieving the scsi
> serial. Mdadm should now abort when creating the container.
> IMSM_DEVNAME_AS_SERIAL can be used to create an array with disks that
> don't have a serial number.
>
> Thanks,
> Artur
>
> diff --git a/sg_io.c b/sg_io.c
> index 42c91e1e..7889a95e 100644
> --- a/sg_io.c
> +++ b/sg_io.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ int scsi_get_serial(int fd, void *buf, size_t buf_len)
> if (rv)
> return rv;
>
> + if ((io_hdr.info & SG_INFO_OK_MASK) != SG_INFO_OK)
> + return -1;
> +
> rsp_len = rsp_buf[3];
>
> if (!rsp_len || buf_len < rsp_len)
Thanks. That does seem to make a useful difference.
It doesn't crash now. I need IMSM_DEVNAME_AS_SERIAL=1 to create the
array, but then it runs smoothly.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 5:04 [PATCH] md: create new workqueue for object destruction NeilBrown
2017-10-18 6:21 ` Shaohua Li
2017-10-18 7:29 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-18 11:21 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2017-10-18 22:36 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-19 8:27 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2017-10-19 22:28 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-20 14:00 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2017-10-22 23:31 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-27 10:44 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2017-10-29 22:18 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-30 13:02 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2017-11-01 3:57 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87po92veg5.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.