From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYb6y-0006jU-TK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:49:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYb6u-00050o-1F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:49:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYb6t-0004zX-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:49:03 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A3C4A6EB for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:49:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <1500645206-13559-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1500645206-13559-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 18:49:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eric Blake's message of "Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:50:33 -0500") Message-ID: <87poctag76.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] tests/libqos/usb: Clean up string interpolation into QMP input List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Eric Blake writes: > On 07/21/2017 08:53 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Leaving interpolation into JSON to qmp() is more robust than building >> QMP input manually, as explained in the previous commit. >> >> The case in usb_test_hotplug() slightly more complicated: it > > s/()/() is/ Will fix. >> interpolates *into* JSON values. Clean it up by building the values >> separately, so we can again leave interpolation to qmp(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> tests/libqos/usb.c | 30 ++++++++++++++---------------- >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/libqos/usb.c b/tests/libqos/usb.c >> index 0cdfaec..f88d4a6 100644 >> --- a/tests/libqos/usb.c >> +++ b/tests/libqos/usb.c >> @@ -40,18 +40,20 @@ void uhci_port_test(struct qhc *hc, int port, uint16_t expect) >> void usb_test_hotplug(const char *hcd_id, const int port, >> void (*port_check)(void)) >> { >> + char id[32]; >> + char *bus; >> QDict *response; >> - char *cmd; >> >> - cmd = g_strdup_printf("{'execute': 'device_add'," >> - " 'arguments': {" >> - " 'driver': 'usb-tablet'," >> - " 'port': '%d'," >> - " 'bus': '%s.0'," >> - " 'id': 'usbdev%d'" >> - "}}", port, hcd_id, port); >> - response = qmp(cmd); >> - g_free(cmd); >> + sprintf(id, "usbdev%d", port); > > I know this fits, but do any of our compilers issue dumb warnings about > possible buffer overflow? I guess we'll deal with that if someone > reports a problem. We do similar things elsewhere, just grep for sprintf. > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Thanks!