From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1ZaOzQ-0004Lw-Tt for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:07:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaOzO-0004Li-Tj for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:07:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaOzK-0005oR-Tf for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:07:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:33860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaOzK-0005oE-NX for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:07:38 -0400 Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so65633497wic.1 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:07:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BKoZSfZNVGLuGqp4w3WW4dA7YDNI/GHsfHR6j6NAsA4=; b=D78QdZbZyqZvGhgPIGksC5Ku2rsCidpd4jHggI1QGsKxSspiD+g6BcxHd0x41U+OcU 3oUyNf6oYG19OTOGZ4E1sIziVOY7+oPrnzbFWls/oLHSVceBVHHYjinoie9qGiSUTzbT zZ0aAEqpku5/KJ/6VcbOD58E6dcBrySMBWsfj6UVRFiu+AcBBBM0su0ztPz3tvbxkAr1 htfgFDAYlTNsItMHNz1eQwV66OJLFcb3TjE4TIeinwHbvGnV0AZ2xpbf8PBs+HrtMotF VYgY3y31aOlM5EnW3V1krl9cS4JTqmob1Vtu3FY0V0sfQ0Y369UuBY3neuTP3V74OkBp eHyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnH3lcToWAaSlvyTrUV9AfgRM/BqAggUXTk5cUz/SD7Dga9ZD4pckqzCIopxTUWbkZi/iEr X-Received: by 10.194.111.232 with SMTP id il8mr82151516wjb.117.1441980457672; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaro.local ([81.128.185.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cm6sm836706wib.22.2015.09.11.07.07.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaro.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaro.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BADA3E0218; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:07:36 +0100 (BST) References: <1438593291-27109-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <55F2889B.4040109@msgid.tls.msk.ru> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Michael Tokarev In-reply-to: <55F2889B.4040109@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:07:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp1p82xj.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.212.169 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v4 00/11] qemu-log, perfmap and other logging tweaks X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:07:43 -0000 Michael Tokarev writes: > 03.08.2015 12:14, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is mostly just a re-base to keep current with master. I've added >> a couple of outstanding s-o-b and r-b tags. There are also two new >> patches in this series which seemed to be worth keeping together: >> >> - a simple patch to dump invocation info in the log >> - the cputlb logging clean-up posted as an RFC last month >> >> Could folks interested in TCG stuff have a look over the light >> re-factor and perf map patches please? >> >> It would be nice to get these in the next cycle but I'm unsure who's >> tree I should be targeting? Most of the top level files touched >> (cputlb, translate-all, qemu-log) just have the list marked as the >> maintainer ;-) > > With this many review comments and somewhat hot discussion about some > patches, I think I have a good excuse to not apply this series > to qemu-tivial tree ;) Yeah makes sense. I'll do a re-spin and probably drop the perfmap stuff for now. There is a proposal for better JIT tracking in perf for JAVA so I suspect we should target that. It's a handy patch to keep around for your own analysis though ;-) > > Keep up the good work please! > > /mjt -- Alex Bennée From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaOzO-0004Lh-Ti for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:07:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaOzK-0005oW-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:07:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:32815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaOzK-0005oC-OY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:07:38 -0400 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so65918908wic.0 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:07:37 -0700 (PDT) References: <1438593291-27109-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <55F2889B.4040109@msgid.tls.msk.ru> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <55F2889B.4040109@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:07:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp1p82xj.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/11] qemu-log, perfmap and other logging tweaks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net Michael Tokarev writes: > 03.08.2015 12:14, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is mostly just a re-base to keep current with master. I've added >> a couple of outstanding s-o-b and r-b tags. There are also two new >> patches in this series which seemed to be worth keeping together: >> >> - a simple patch to dump invocation info in the log >> - the cputlb logging clean-up posted as an RFC last month >> >> Could folks interested in TCG stuff have a look over the light >> re-factor and perf map patches please? >> >> It would be nice to get these in the next cycle but I'm unsure who's >> tree I should be targeting? Most of the top level files touched >> (cputlb, translate-all, qemu-log) just have the list marked as the >> maintainer ;-) > > With this many review comments and somewhat hot discussion about some > patches, I think I have a good excuse to not apply this series > to qemu-tivial tree ;) Yeah makes sense. I'll do a re-spin and probably drop the perfmap stuff for now. There is a proposal for better JIT tracking in perf for JAVA so I suspect we should target that. It's a handy patch to keep around for your own analysis though ;-) > > Keep up the good work please! > > /mjt -- Alex Bennée