From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci-phb: check for the 32-bit overflow
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:30:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pp6qqi75.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150424130630.00bb9412@thh440s>
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:56:57 +0200
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:22:33 +0530
>> Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Hi Thomas,
>> >
>> > Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
>> > > Am Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:27:19 +0530
>> > > schrieb Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>> > >
>> > >> With the addition of 64-bit BARS and increase in the mmio address
>> > >> space, the code was hitting this limit. The memory of pci devices
>> > >> across the bridges were not accessible due to which the drivers
>> > >> failed.
>> > >>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs | 3 ++-
>> > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >>
>> > >> diff --git a/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs b/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs
>> > >> index 529772f..e307d95 100644
>> > >> --- a/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs
>> > >> +++ b/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs
>> > >> @@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ setup-puid
>> > >> decode-64 2 / dup >r \ Decode and calc size/2
>> > >> pci-next-mem @ + dup pci-max-mem ! \ and calc max mem address
>> > >
>> > > Could pci-max-mem overflow, too?
>> >
>> > Should not, its only the boundary that was an issue.
>> >
>> > Qemu sends base and size, base + size can be till uint32 max. So for
>> > example base was 0xC000.0000 and size was 0x4000.0000, we add up base +
>> > size and put pci-max-mmio as 0x1.0000.0000, which would get programmend
>> > in the bridge bars: lower limit as 0xC000 and 0x0000 as upper
>> > limit. And no mmio access were going across the bridge.
>> >
>> > In my testing, I have found one more issue with translate-my-address,
>> > it does not take care of 64-bit addresses. I have a patch working for
>> > SLOF, but its breaking the guest kernel booting.
>> >
>> > >
>> > >> dup pci-next-mmio ! \ which is the same as MMIO base
>> > >> - r> + pci-max-mmio ! \ calc max MMIO address
>> > >> + r> + FFFFFFFF min pci-max-mmio ! \ calc max MMIO address and
>> > >> + \ check the 32-bit boundary
>>
>> Ok, thanks a lot for the example! I think your patch likely works in
>> practice, but after staring at the code for a while, I think the real
>> bug is slightly different. If I get the code above right, pci-max-mmio
>> is normally set to the first address that is _not_ part of the mmio
>> window anymore, right. Now have a look at pci-bridge-set-mmio-base in
>> pci-scan.fs:
>>
>> : pci-bridge-set-mmio-base ( addr -- )
>> pci-next-mmio @ 100000 #aligned \ read the current Value and align to 1MB boundary
>> dup 100000 + pci-next-mmio ! \ and write back with 1MB for bridge
>> 10 rshift \ mmio-base reg is only the upper 16 bits
>> pci-max-mmio @ FFFF0000 and or \ and Insert mmio Limit (set it to max)
>> swap 20 + rtas-config-l! \ and write it into the bridge
>> ;
>>
>> Seems like the pci-max-mmio, i.e. the first address that is not in the
>> window anymore, is programmed into the memory limit register here - but
>> according to the pci-to-pci bridge specification, it should be the last
>> address of the window instead.
>>
>> So I think the correct fix would be to decrease the pci-max-mmio
>> value in pci-bridge-set-mmio-base by 1- before programming it into the
>> limit register (note: in pci-bridge-set-mmio-limit you can find a "1-"
>> already, so I think this also should be done in
>> pci-bridge-set-mmio-base, too)
>>
>> So if you've got some spare minutes, could you please check whether that
>> would fix the issue, too?
>
> By the way, if I'm right, pci-bridge-set-mem-base seems to suffer from
> the same problem, too.
Both have the same issue, so fixed like below
diff --git a/slof/fs/pci-scan.fs b/slof/fs/pci-scan.fs
index 15d0c8e..a552a74 100644
--- a/slof/fs/pci-scan.fs
+++ b/slof/fs/pci-scan.fs
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ here 100 allot CONSTANT pci-device-vec
pci-next-mmio @ 100000 #aligned \ read the current Value and align to 1MB boundary
dup 100000 + pci-next-mmio ! \ and write back with 1MB for bridge
10 rshift \ mmio-base reg is only the upper 16 bits
- pci-max-mmio @ FFFF0000 and or \ and Insert mmio Limit (set it to max)
+ pci-max-mmio @ 1- FFFF0000 and or \ and Insert mmio Limit (set it to max)
swap 20 + rtas-config-l! \ and write it into the bridge
;
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ here 100 allot CONSTANT pci-device-vec
2 pick 2C + rtas-config-l! \ | and set the Limit
THEN \ FI
10 rshift \ keep upper 16 bits
- pci-max-mem @ FFFF0000 and or \ and Insert mmem Limit (set it to max)
+ pci-max-mem @ 1- FFFF0000 and or \ and Insert mmem Limit (set it to max)
swap 24 + rtas-config-l! \ and write it into the bridge
;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-27 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 10:57 [PATCH 1/2] pci-phb: check for the 32-bit overflow Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-23 13:43 ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-24 3:52 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-24 10:56 ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-24 11:06 ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-27 5:00 ` Nikunj A Dadhania [this message]
2015-04-27 5:41 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-27 4:58 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pp6qqi75.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.