From: Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlemeir@nbsps.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: vf610_nfc: remove caching of page in buffer
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:48:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pp7fkhot.fsf@nbsps.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3f863b1136fbe0dfa9f0e726e5820b3@agner.ch> (Stefan Agner's message of "Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:09:18 +0200")
On 7 Apr 2015, stefan at agner.ch wrote:
> On 2015-04-07 16:24, Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
>> The OOB patch also significantly decreases UbiFS mounting time in
>> Linux. I load Linux itself via tftp/network and not using u-boot
>> with nand. I guess I should try that.
> Is it UBIFS mounting time or is it bad block scanning? Afaik, it
> should speed up the latter significantly, but I don't see why it
> should speed up the former.
It is both,
* no changes.
[0.840632] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xca
[0.964838] 0x000001040000-0x000010000000 : "root"
.124s
base ubi0 mount is .833585s
* improved READ_OOB
[0.638869] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xca
[0.707994] 0x000001040000-0x000010000000 : "root"
.069s
base ubi0 mount 1/10s reduction. .738204s
This is for a 256MB device. The Ubi mount/scan time is not completely
in-significant.
For instance, here is my last run with improved READ_OOB
[ 0.942538] ubi0: attaching mtd3
...
[ 1.680742] ubi0: background thread "ubi_bgt0d" started, PID 104
This is my 'base ubi0 mount' numbers.
The time is slightly different than what I recorded previously. I
booted several times without 'READ_OOB' and the times were consistently
'.83xxS'. It is possible that the initial BBT scan being quicker
altered something; so it is not UBI use of OOB. I am not sure. I just
noted that it was ??significantly?? different.
Regards,
Bill Pringlemeir.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-02 9:05 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: vf610_nfc: remove caching of page in buffer Stefan Agner
2015-04-02 9:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mtd: vf610_nfc: implement OOB only read Stefan Agner
2015-04-02 20:30 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: vf610_nfc: remove caching of page in buffer Bill Pringlemeir
2015-04-07 13:14 ` Stefan Agner
2015-04-07 14:24 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2015-04-07 15:09 ` Stefan Agner
2015-04-07 16:48 ` Bill Pringlemeir [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pp7fkhot.fsf@nbsps.com \
--to=bpringlemeir@nbsps.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.