All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] perf tools: enable LBR call stack support
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:54:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ppclqcif.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415972652-17310-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (kan liang's message of "Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:10 -0500")

On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:10 -0500, kan liang wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
>
> Currently, there are two call chain recording options, fp and dwarf.
> Haswell has a new feature that utilizes the existing LBR facility to
> record call chains. So it provides the third options to record call
> chain. This patch enables the lbr call stack support.
>
> LBR call stack has some limitations. It reuses current LBR facility, so
> LBR call stack and branch record can not be enabled at the same time. It
> is only available for user callchain.
> However, LBR call stack can work on the user app which doesn't have
> frame-pointer or dwarf debug info compiled. It is a good alternative
> when nothing else works.

So this is only for Haswell or later, right?  What if user gives it to
the other CPUs - is it fail or ignore silently?  I think we need to warn
user about it more kindly..

Thanks,
Namhyung

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-18  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-14 13:44 [PATCH V3 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) kan.liang
2014-11-14 13:44 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] perf tools: enable LBR call stack support kan.liang
2014-11-18  5:54   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2014-11-18 13:57     ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-14 13:44 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] perf tool: Move cpumode resolve code to add_callchain_ip kan.liang
2014-11-17 13:57   ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-17 14:00   ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-18  8:24   ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-21 15:06     ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-21 15:19       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-11-14 13:44 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] perf tools: Construct LBR call chain kan.liang
2014-11-17 15:54   ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-17 17:41     ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-18  6:13       ` Namhyung Kim
2014-11-18  7:55         ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-18 14:37           ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-18 19:40             ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-19  5:57               ` Namhyung Kim
2014-11-17 15:55   ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-18  6:14     ` Namhyung Kim
2014-11-18  6:25   ` Namhyung Kim
2014-11-18 14:01     ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-19  6:01       ` Namhyung Kim
2014-11-19 13:37         ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-17 16:01 ` [PATCH V3 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ppclqcif.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.