From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WlJLs-0001E5-Jz for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 14:43:13 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Sparklan cards References: <2747CB3C-580D-4F35-9617-3616D1617C5D@st-andrews.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 17:42:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: <2747CB3C-580D-4F35-9617-3616D1617C5D@st-andrews.ac.uk> (Mamun Abu-Tair's message of "Fri, 16 May 2014 15:36:05 +0100") Message-ID: <87ppjd3huh.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Mamun Abu-Tair Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Mamun Abu-Tair writes: > Dose anyone get 500Mbps throughput using the Sparklan cards?!! I > managed to achieve 177 Mbps using those cards. Do I need to order the > Compex ones as they seem has much better performance? You are not the first one to mention problems with Sparklan cards, the archives should have similar reports. Unfortunately I don't have any of those cards but it would be good to get more information so that we can investigate what's wrong. For example, debug logs with 0x432 would be a good start. http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath10k/debug -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k