From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2014, #02; Fri, 9) Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 20:06:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87ppjkw5oi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <536d4bd48e3f9_585ea5308b2@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Felipe Contreras , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 11 20:07:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WjY9h-0001qw-G8 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 20:07:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755504AbaEKSHO (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2014 14:07:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:57586 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751687AbaEKSHN (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2014 14:07:13 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56627 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjY9X-00058x-S8; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:07:12 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 56748E0F50; Sun, 11 May 2014 20:06:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 11 May 2014 10:51:19 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Is making that decision as the maintainer unilateral? Without addressing anything else, this point is vacuous. The whole point of begin "maintainer" is that you are the one making the decisions. Of course making a decision from the position of the one making the decisions is unilateral. The salient questions rather are whether the decision is sensible, takes into account all available input and is communicated in a reasonable manner. -- David Kastrup