From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: Is there something like a blamed diff? Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:41:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppmltz5y.fsf@thomasrast.ch> References: <8738jk1as7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ioseujej.fsf@thomasrast.ch> <8761oeuhmg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 17 18:41:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFSCA-0002nW-4Q for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:41:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753346AbaBQRlR (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:41:17 -0500 Received: from ip1.thgersdorf.net ([148.251.9.194]:52764 "EHLO mail.psioc.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752945AbaBQRlQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:41:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.psioc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFECB4D65D8; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:41:14 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at psioc.net Received: from mail.psioc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.psioc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oRN10kYqameg; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:41:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux-1gf2.thomasrast.ch (84-73-49-17.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.49.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.psioc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D996F4D64BD; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:41:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <8761oeuhmg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:02:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > Thomas Rast writes: > >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> When comparing two branches, decorating the flat diff with the >>> respectively responsible commits seems like it would be nice to do/have >>> (the blame on the identical parts, in contrast, is not really >>> interesting). Is there any tool that provides something like that? >> >> This seems to come up every year or so: >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110369/focus=110383 > > Nice. That one could likely be sped up by calling git-blame just once > on each file with multiple -L options. Yes. You'll note that the email predates the support for multiple -L options by a few years :-) I never had a need for such a script, I just wrote that in response to someone asking about it. If you find it useful, please clean it up for inclusion in contrib/. -- Thomas Rast tr@thomasrast.ch