From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:52:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:56552 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6823083Ab3KEXwYYgmbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:52:24 +0100 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3dDnjX2dWdz3hj1X; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:52:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3dDnjW6lRkzbbjd; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:52:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ROsFvl2qYFKv; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:52:14 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: QcbDWV/uc6gMXZ3FC0JKelBc5MfUgtvFzKOyXT2NHl4= Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-38-26.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.38.26]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:52:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BEFC2C1786; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:52:14 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Rich Felker Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , David Daney , "Pinski\, Andrew" , Andreas Barth , David Miller , aurelien@aurel32.net, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: prlimit64: inconsistencies between kernel and userland References: <20130628133835.GA21839@hall.aurel32.net> <20131104213756.GD18700@hall.aurel32.net> <20131104.194519.1657797548878784116.davem@davemloft.net> <20131105012203.GA24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20131105085859.GE28240@mails.so.argh.org> <20131105183732.GB24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <52793C50.9030300@gmail.com> <20131105223953.GG24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Yow: ..Everything is....FLIPPING AROUND!! Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:52:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20131105223953.GG24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's message of "Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:39:53 -0500") Message-ID: <87ppqez9sh.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 38461 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: schwab@linux-m68k.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Rich Felker writes: > BTW, what happens on a distro where -dev packages are separate and the > user compiles with old headers (not having upgraded the dev package) > but new libc.so? :-) The devel package must either be self-contained or require the matching non-devel package. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:56552 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6823083Ab3KEXwYYgmbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:52:24 +0100 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: prlimit64: inconsistencies between kernel and userland References: <20130628133835.GA21839@hall.aurel32.net> <20131104213756.GD18700@hall.aurel32.net> <20131104.194519.1657797548878784116.davem@davemloft.net> <20131105012203.GA24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20131105085859.GE28240@mails.so.argh.org> <20131105183732.GB24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <52793C50.9030300@gmail.com> <20131105223953.GG24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:52:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20131105223953.GG24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's message of "Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:39:53 -0500") Message-ID: <87ppqez9sh.fsf@igel.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Rich Felker Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , David Daney , "Pinski, Andrew" , Andreas Barth , David Miller , aurelien@aurel32.net, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Message-ID: <20131105235214.RzNb4bbmhpi2gZ96cDgx0dm1_jGdvJgUXk-sU5xIKrk@z> Rich Felker writes: > BTW, what happens on a distro where -dev packages are separate and the > user compiles with old headers (not having upgraded the dev package) > but new libc.so? :-) The devel package must either be self-contained or require the matching non-devel package. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."