All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: li guang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
	acme@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	feng.tang@intel.com, namhyung.kim@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf annotate: Fix build with NO_NEWT=1
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:31:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ppzmsd12.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361927668.2262.36.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> (li guang's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:14:28 +0800")

Hi li guang,

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:14:28 +0800, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-02-26二的 18:02 +0900,Namhyung Kim写道:
>> Hi Michael,
>> 
>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:02:02 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > Commit 18c9e5c "Make it to be able to skip unannotatable symbols" broke
>> > the build with NO_NEWT=1:
>> >
>> >    CC builtin-annotate.o
>> > builtin-annotate.c: In function 'hists__find_annotations':
>> > builtin-annotate.c:161:4: error: duplicate case value
>> > builtin-annotate.c:154:4: error: previously used here
>> > make: *** [builtin-annotate.o] Error 1
>> >
>> > This is because without NEWT support K_LEFT is #defined to -1 in
>> > utils/hist.h
>> >
>> > Fix it by shifting the K_LEFT/K_RIGHT #defines out of the likely range
>> > of error values.
>> 
>> Argh, didn't check NO_NEWT build on this, sorry.
>> 
>> The hist_entry__tui_annotate() - hence, symbol__tui_annotate() - returns
>> either key code or error code.  This is not good IMHO but not sure it's
>> worth refactoring.  Maybe we can move the error check to under default
>> case so that possible future error checks to be done?
>
> or can we skip gui-code-snippet when there's no gui library?
> anyway, for present fix-up, we can just temporarily change K_LEFT value
> like Michael's or my patch, I think.

That part of code won't be run on NO_NEWT build since the 'use_browser'
would be value of 0.  It's just a compilation problem.

Anyway, I have no objection from the both of patches for now.

Thanks,
Namhyung

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-27  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-26  5:02 [PATCH 1/2] perf annotate: Fix build with NO_NEWT=1 Michael Ellerman
2013-02-26  5:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf report: " Michael Ellerman
2013-02-26  8:48   ` Feng Tang
2013-02-26 11:46     ` Michael Ellerman
2013-03-18 10:51   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Michael Ellerman
2013-02-26  9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf annotate: " Namhyung Kim
2013-02-27  1:14   ` li guang
2013-02-27  1:22     ` Michael Ellerman
2013-02-27  1:29       ` li guang
2013-02-27  1:29       ` li guang
2013-02-27  2:31     ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-03-18 10:50 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ppzmsd12.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.