From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: OMAP: fix build errors: depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:31:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqbb5nfq.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120413185322.GG25053@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:53:22 +0100")
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:20:22PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> On 03/26/2012 05:19 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> The OMAP driver needs a 'depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS' since it only
>>> builds for OMAP2+ platforms.
>>>
>>> This 'depends on' was in the original patch from Russell King, but was
>>> erroneously removed by me when making this option user-selectable in
>>> commit b09db45c (cpufreq: OMAP driver depends CPUfreq tables.) This
>>> patch remedies that.
>>>
>>> Apologies to Russell King for breaking his originally working patch.
>>>
>>> Also, thanks to Grazvydas Ignotas for reporting the same problem.
>>>
>>> Cc: Russell King<rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas<notasas@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Dave, this applies on top of your current fixes branch, and fixes a
>>> problem introduced there by me. Please merge for v3.4-rc. Thanks.
>>
>> Can you pick this up for v3.4-rc?
>
> Right, I'm fed up with chasing over this trivial patch. It's been almost
> a full month since the problem was first reported and it _still_ remains
> unfixed in mainline, despite me chasing over it. So, sorry, you lose.
>
> I'm merging my fix (attached) which I've been running against the nightly
> builds into my fixes branch and will ask Linus to pull it this weekend.
> If you want something else, then please send a patch on top of my fix to
> do what you want.
>
> Alternatively, send a replacement fix to Linus _before_ Sunday evening
> copying me with it and I'll drop this from my tree. But I want to see
> an alternative going to Linus for that to happen.
I've (re)sent the patches now.
I just resent the CPUfreq driver Kconfig fix, this time directly to Linus.
I also just resent the arch/arm/mach-omap2 one to Tony/Paul with a
slightly updated changelog making it clear that removing that dead code
also fixes build errors so it can be queued ASAP for v3.4-rc.
Combined, those fix the problems your patch addresses.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: OMAP: fix build errors: depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:31:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqbb5nfq.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120413185322.GG25053@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:53:22 +0100")
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:20:22PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> On 03/26/2012 05:19 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> The OMAP driver needs a 'depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS' since it only
>>> builds for OMAP2+ platforms.
>>>
>>> This 'depends on' was in the original patch from Russell King, but was
>>> erroneously removed by me when making this option user-selectable in
>>> commit b09db45c (cpufreq: OMAP driver depends CPUfreq tables.) This
>>> patch remedies that.
>>>
>>> Apologies to Russell King for breaking his originally working patch.
>>>
>>> Also, thanks to Grazvydas Ignotas for reporting the same problem.
>>>
>>> Cc: Russell King<rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas<notasas@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Dave, this applies on top of your current fixes branch, and fixes a
>>> problem introduced there by me. Please merge for v3.4-rc. Thanks.
>>
>> Can you pick this up for v3.4-rc?
>
> Right, I'm fed up with chasing over this trivial patch. It's been almost
> a full month since the problem was first reported and it _still_ remains
> unfixed in mainline, despite me chasing over it. So, sorry, you lose.
>
> I'm merging my fix (attached) which I've been running against the nightly
> builds into my fixes branch and will ask Linus to pull it this weekend.
> If you want something else, then please send a patch on top of my fix to
> do what you want.
>
> Alternatively, send a replacement fix to Linus _before_ Sunday evening
> copying me with it and I'll drop this from my tree. But I want to see
> an alternative going to Linus for that to happen.
I've (re)sent the patches now.
I just resent the CPUfreq driver Kconfig fix, this time directly to Linus.
I also just resent the arch/arm/mach-omap2 one to Tony/Paul with a
slightly updated changelog making it clear that removing that dead code
also fixes build errors so it can be queued ASAP for v3.4-rc.
Combined, those fix the problems your patch addresses.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-27 0:19 [PATCH] cpufreq: OMAP: fix build errors: depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS Kevin Hilman
2012-03-27 0:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-30 13:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-30 13:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-30 14:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-30 14:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-04 22:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-04 22:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-13 18:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-13 18:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-13 21:31 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-04-13 21:31 ` Kevin Hilman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-13 20:32 Kevin Hilman
2012-04-13 20:32 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pqbb5nfq.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.