From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqpDW-0000BF-Gv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:22:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqpDS-0000AV-4M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:22:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46668 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MqpDR-0000AS-Op for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:22:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29056) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MqpDR-0004XQ-6t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:22:37 -0400 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8OEMaGl003278 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:22:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: show failing device name instead of silently exiting References: <1253704471-30740-1-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com> <8763b97588.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <20090924035908.GA4584@amit-x200.redhat.com> <87my4kqxl8.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <20090924133144.GA19389@amit-x200.redhat.com> From: Markus Armbruster Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:22:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20090924133144.GA19389@amit-x200.redhat.com> (Amit Shah's message of "Thu\, 24 Sep 2009 19\:01\:44 +0530") Message-ID: <87pr9gpglx.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amit Shah Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Amit Shah writes: > On (Thu) Sep 24 2009 [15:30:27], Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Amit Shah writes: >> >> > Hey Markus, >> > >> > On (Wed) Sep 23 2009 [22:53:27], Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Amit Shah writes: >> >> >> >> > If initializing a device fails, show the name of the device >> >> > and then exit >> >> >> >> "and then exit" is misleading, as you don't add an exit. >> > >> > The 'return NULL' does that -- the calling function exits. >> > (doesn't the subject line clarify that?) >> >> You could say "show the name of the device before exiting". > > That's what the subject says! :-) > >> The message as you worded it made me look for an exit where there wasn't >> one before. > > I'll respin it nevertheless. > > Amit Thanks, and hope you don't mind me being such a stickler for clear commit messages.