From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JEkqL-0001tu-A5 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:37 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEkqJ-0001sX-Sw for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEkqG-0001pK-C0 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JEkqG-0001pD-1Z for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:32 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.21]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEkqF-00012Q-Jo for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:31 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0FCOTdG078949 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:24:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20080114141015.GA27293@thorin> <200801142132.39086.okuji@enbug.org> <20080114204751.GA6888@thorin> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:25:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20080114204751.GA6888@thorin> (Robert Millan's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:47:51 +0100") Message-ID: <87prw31dje.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix flickering timeout message for slow terminals (gfxterm) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:24:36 -0000 Robert Millan writes: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:32:39PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: >> On Monday 14 January 2008 15:10, Robert Millan wrote: >> > As subject says. Based on suggestions from Vesa. >> >> Why do you want to use a nested function? > > No special reason; just to restrict the namespace use to the scope where > it'll be needed, and avoid passing of parameters (offset, timeout). > > I'm fine with moving it out if that's preferred. If it doesn't uglify your code, that's usually a better thing to do. -- Marco