From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Ithxe-00075t-IY for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:05:10 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ithxd-00072v-FP for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:05:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ithxc-00071f-S9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:05:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ithxc-00071W-NZ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:05:08 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.29]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ithxc-0005j4-5w for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:05:08 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAIB57Hw056467 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:05:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <472F3D31.3010204@nic.fi> <4730DE0F.9090103@nic.fi> <4731DD6C.6080807@nic.fi> <4732113E.5070305@nic.fi> <87abpmgjm9.fsf@xs4all.nl> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:06:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Markus Elfring's message of "Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:01:41 +0100") Message-ID: <87pry7stid.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: Outline menu X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:05:09 -0000 Markus Elfring writes: >> Personally I first want to focus on getting what we have to work, >> before even thinking about anything else. Ideas are good, but having >> *something* to use is better :-) > > It seems that all relevant design aspects are not clear at the moment. > I would prefer a bit more clarity about the open issues. Why not? It has been discussed on the list before. -- Marco