From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAC9A79CD for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 20:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774212455; cv=none; b=Bhll55Tmvwr1T8LSjhENEjAr5AsKZkzBNhKrGVGGi6DCJVquqOQ2vHtMQ1YZ4CQZEKNqFZNEuXFN2ur1xl0STzu3Ofdbv7DukzeWzbobhJTAhbAAoN9y+y3tAzf+3m1KNeY1mh8MYsuT5cZMnXGKvTw5nyxdf2LlFX1VYl9WcSY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774212455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E7P+d49hDB0FEXOt7Cn3UYR2bLrG+otFVJR4ZfLAPDs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XnBIWrhMfTPCEtKCdK6+4JmAyLmAgLNPKDj4vDmsSBLC1kORagT7Iakq5kKIsWidf9tEVLxp4R9S0KiA5U0C/WB2LO6tMIoucC0qtHodUaITzdFQ/yT1241hpG26hIQxD3OeOStgwuDP0VOoSGJEHF1l+Mf5yLHDrIxLOS1+iwg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=LIv5VvNx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="LIv5VvNx" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2DE78411E2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1774212454; bh=E7P+d49hDB0FEXOt7Cn3UYR2bLrG+otFVJR4ZfLAPDs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=LIv5VvNxKX8SVdmdnuEfOlIKuZnW1UNbVErRUclLmhM/6frcBLeWpEJBQqV2dEJoh +UVAQXRu/Jz1BiPyvCeMYL0g2kxYKKd4j21nHOUJ0TS1YdG4qtaC0c7khNFha3WN05 QcIAqFA2sfYBb2pMPp7waR6S3/+Qeo1OZ+hXu1lvD+t7uU79LROdKhBCVJdi1j1q04 IVZRdxkDLKZq4uIO6ZP+QnnCnRGLqwwye2fhFACTFErEle8yNXWVD24a358urPuN+2 bppdPwzL/nOZmPWPuIRzyWrC3lV7NyyLGkilx1zSFP9edixiAf1trElVbv8lBmslCc bYYEpCUwdO9IA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DE78411E2; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 20:47:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Pereira Cc: Daniel Castro , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: pt_BR: translate process/1.Intro.rst In-Reply-To: References: <20260316212435.19303-1-arantescastro@gmail.com> <20260317140136.29256-1-arantescastro@gmail.com> <875x6ubdci.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 14:47:33 -0600 Message-ID: <87qzpbd21m.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Daniel Pereira writes: > Hello Jon, > > Initially, no, there are no further blocking issues for application. > > The purpose of my comments was solely related to the initial > organization of the collaboration and ensuring adherence to community > submission practices. > > As for the content itself, the Portuguese documentation is > grammatically perfect. The normal way of saying that is Reviewed-by or Acked-by :) I've applied the patch, thanks. jon