From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Petteri Kangaslampi <pekangas@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: arm64: Fix hyp VA size between layout and MMU
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:34:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87qzscdlvi.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223193440.1441657-1-pekangas@google.com>
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:34:39 +0000,
Petteri Kangaslampi <pekangas@google.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> In the KVM initialization code, kvm_mmu_init() and
> kvm_compute_layout() use different logic when determining the
> hypervisor's virtual address space size. Specifically, the MMU code
> uses the larger of vabits_actual (the kernel's VA size) and
> IDMAP_VA_BITS (48 bits), while the VA layout code just uses the
> kernel's VA size.
>
> This means that if the kernel is configured with a VA size of less
> than 48 bits (like happens in our environment), the assumptions used
> to calculate hyp_physvirt_offset and the code that determines VA
> ranges to use for mappings in hyp/nvhe/mm.c get out of sync, which can
> results in mapping failures.
>
> The immediate fix is pretty obvious and attached here. This is against
> 6.12 but I don't think this code has changed recently. I think longer
> term refactoring knowledge of the hypervisor's address space into one
> place might be helpful; currently it is a bit spread out.
I'm sorry, but posting a patch against a kernel that is over a year
old doesn't help. It may apply, but it doesn't mean it works. Please
post a tested patch against the latest released kernel, or even
better, the latest -rc.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-30 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 19:34 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: arm64: Fix hyp VA size between layout and MMU Petteri Kangaslampi
2025-12-23 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Petteri Kangaslampi
2025-12-30 15:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-30 15:34 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87qzscdlvi.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pekangas@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.