All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,  Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,  Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,  libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/10] sched_getattr: port to copy_struct_to_user
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:51:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r04xdd93.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b66580447aa94593136186a4046fd350e598943a.camel@xry111.site> (Xi Ruoyao's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2025 17:21:08 +0800")

* Xi Ruoyao:

>> > So should we drop the test before Glibc-2.41 release?  I'm seeing the
>> > failure during my machine test.
>> I was waiting for a verdict from the kernel developers.  I didn't expect
>> such a change to happen given the alleged UAPI policy.
>
> But 6.13 is already released without reverting the behavior change
> now...  So is this the "final" verdict?

I had originally missed the Linux 6.13 release.  I've submitted a glibc
patch:

  [PATCH] Linux: Do not check unused bytes after sched_getattr in
  tst-sched_setattr
  <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/87v7u9ddas.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com/>

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-20  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 20:40 [PATCH RFC v3 00/10] extensible syscalls: CHECK_FIELDS to allow for easier feature detection Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/10] uaccess: add copy_struct_to_user helper Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/10] sched_getattr: port to copy_struct_to_user Aleksa Sarai
2024-12-10 18:14   ` Florian Weimer
2024-12-11 10:23     ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-18 13:02       ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-01-20  5:28         ` Florian Weimer
2025-01-20  9:21           ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-01-20  9:51             ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/10] openat2: explicitly return -E2BIG for (usize > PAGE_SIZE) Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-10  6:24   ` Greg KH
2024-10-10 10:09   ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/10] openat2: add CHECK_FIELDS flag to usize argument Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/10] selftests: openat2: add 0xFF poisoned data after misaligned struct Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/10] selftests: openat2: add CHECK_FIELDS selftests Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/10] clone3: add CHECK_FIELDS flag to usize argument Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/10] selftests: clone3: add CHECK_FIELDS selftests Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/10] mount_setattr: add CHECK_FIELDS flag to usize argument Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/10] selftests: mount_setattr: add CHECK_FIELDS selftest Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-10  6:26 ` [PATCH RFC v3 00/10] extensible syscalls: CHECK_FIELDS to allow for easier feature detection Florian Weimer
2024-10-21 14:51 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2024-10-21 21:38   ` Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r04xdd93.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.