From: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"open list:ZONEFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"gost.dev@samsung.com" <gost.dev@samsung.com>,
Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zonefs: do not use append if device does not support it
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:23:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0pygjp1.fsf@metaspace.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02730282-88b0-572e-439c-719cfef379bb@wdc.com>
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com> writes:
> On 26.06.23 18:47, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> From: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk>
>>
>> Zonefs will try to use `zonefs_file_dio_append()` for direct sync writes even if
>> device `max_zone_append_sectors` is zero. This will cause the IO to fail as the
>> io vector is truncated to zero. It also causes a call to
>> `invalidate_inode_pages2_range()` with end set to UINT_MAX, which is probably
>> not intentional. Thus, do not use append when device does not support it.
>>
>
> I'm sorry but I think it has been stated often enough that for Linux Zone Append
> is a mandatory feature for a Zoned Block Device. Therefore this path is essentially
> dead code as max_zone_append_sectors will always be greater than zero.
>
> So this is a clear NAK from my side.
OK, thanks for clarifying 👍 I came across this bugging out while
playing around with zone append for ublk. The code makes sense if the
stack expects append to always be present.
I didn't follow the discussion, could you reiterate why the policy is
that zoned devices _must_ support append?
Best regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-26 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 16:47 [PATCH] zonefs: do not use append if device does not support it Andreas Hindborg
2023-06-26 17:54 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-06-26 18:23 ` Andreas Hindborg (Samsung) [this message]
2023-06-27 0:21 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-27 5:45 ` Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)
2023-06-27 3:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-27 4:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-27 4:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-27 4:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-27 5:14 ` Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r0pygjp1.fsf@metaspace.dk \
--to=nmi@metaspace.dk \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.