From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsc: Refactor dsc gen checks
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:24:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0yb59yf.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221110093312.13932-1-swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> wrote:
> Use HAS_DSC(__i915) wrapper containing runtime info of has_dsc
> member. Platforms supporting dsc has this flag enabled; no need of
> DISPLAY_VER() check.
>
> Also, simplified intel_dsc_source_support() based on above changes.
>
> Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 11 ++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 7400d6b4c587..f6f9257bd202 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> * Output bpp is stored in 6.4 format so right shift by 4 to get the
> * integer value since we support only integer values of bpp.
> */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 &&
> + if (HAS_DSC(dev_priv) &&
> drm_dp_sink_supports_dsc(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd)) {
> /*
> * TBD pass the connector BPC,
> @@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp_set_max_sink_lane_count(intel_dp);
>
> /* Read the eDP DSC DPCD registers */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10)
> + if (HAS_DSC(dev_priv))
> intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(intel_dp);
>
> /*
> @@ -4691,7 +4691,7 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
> }
>
> /* Read DP Sink DSC Cap DPCD regs for DP v1.4 */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> + if (HAS_DSC(dev_priv))
> intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(intel_dp);
>
> intel_dp_configure_mst(intel_dp);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> index 269f9792390d..7b4d300a4dd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> @@ -344,16 +344,13 @@ bool intel_dsc_source_support(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
>
> - if (!RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->has_dsc)
> + if (!HAS_DSC(i915))
> return false;
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
> - return true;
> -
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11 && cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_A)
> - return true;
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 11 && cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_A)
> + return false;
>
> - return false;
> + return true;
> }
>
> static bool is_pipe_dsc(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 05b3300cc4ed..9d1fe5d6a104 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -484,6 +484,7 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> #define INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) (to_pci_dev((dev_priv)->drm.dev)->revision)
>
> #define HAS_DSB(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.has_dsb)
> +#define HAS_DSC(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->has_dsc)
>
> #define INTEL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.display_step)
> #define INTEL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.graphics_step)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-10 9:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsc: Refactor dsc gen checks Swati Sharma
2022-11-10 11:24 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-11-30 10:43 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-11-10 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for " Patchwork
2022-11-10 23:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-11 8:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-11-23 11:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/dsc: Refactor dsc gen checks (rev2) Patchwork
2022-11-23 11:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-29 16:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/dsc: Refactor dsc gen checks (rev3) Patchwork
2022-11-29 16:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-11-29 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-29 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-11-30 8:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r0yb59yf.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.