Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] linux-user/aarch64: Reset target data on MADV_DONTNEED

["Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>]

Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> writes:

> Le 11/08/2022 à 13:54, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 at 09:29, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 10/08/2022 à 22:47, Richard Henderson a écrit :
>>>> On 8/10/22 13:32, Vitaly Buka wrote:
>>>>> Sorry, I only noticed today that it's not submitted.
>>>>> Version is not critical for us, as we build from masters anyway.
>>>>> Richard, do you know a reason to consider this critical?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 13:04, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org
>>>>> <mailto:peter.maydell@linaro.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 21:00, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com
>>>>>      <mailto:vitalybuka@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>       >
>>>>>       > How can we land this one?
>>>>>
>>>>>      Pinging it a week ago rather than now would have been a good start :-(
>>>>>      I think it got missed because you didn't cc the linux-user maintainer.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Is this a critical fix for 7.1 or can we let it slip to 7.2 ?
>>>>
>>>> It's unfortunate that it got missed.  It's not critical, but it would be nice, because support for
>>>> MADV_DONTNEED is new in 7.1 (previously, we ignored all madvise).
>>>>
>>>> I'll note there are missing braces for coding style on an IF.
>>>>
>>>> Laurent, do you have an objection to merging this for rc3?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No objection.
>>>
>>> Do you want it goes via the arm branch or via the linux-user branch?
>>>
>>> If it goes via linux-user I can run the LTP testsuite but it takes 1 day.
>> I think we should definitely run the LTP testsuite on it, so
>> taking it via linux-user probably makes more sense.
>
> ok, applied to my linux-user-for-7.1 branch.
>
> Running tests.

Any chance you could pick up:

  Subject: [PATCH v2] linux-user: un-parent OBJECT(cpu) when closing thread
  Date: Wed,  3 Aug 2022 14:05:37 +0100
  Message-Id: <20220803130537.763666-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

before you run the tests?

>
> Thanks,
> Laurent


-- 
Alex Bennée