From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20220403144348.1775590-1-rpm@xenomai.org> <317493564.212576.1649003575604.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <87ilrqnjdp.fsf@xenomai.org> <656392314.214549.1649064591209.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <87ee2colqg.fsf@xenomai.org> <419235.1649236412@gemini.denx.de> From: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: dovetail: reinstate I/O bitmap on user entry Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 12:14:16 +0200 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87r16a1pf7.fsf@xenomai.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Wolfgang Denk , Philippe Gerum via Xenomai , Richard Weinberger Jan Kiszka writes: > On 06.04.22 11:13, Wolfgang Denk via Xenomai wrote: >> Dear Philippe, >> >> In message <87ee2colqg.fsf@xenomai.org> you wrote: >>> >>>> BTW: Do you have a Patchwork instance for the Xenomai mailing list? >>> >>> Unfortunately not. >>> >>>> I makes dealing with patch >>>> series so much easier. >>>> >>>> Or even better, can we have Xenomai at lore.kernel.org? Then we can use b= >>> 4. :-) >>> >>> It seems unlikely that kernel.org would consider hosting us since the >>> project does not upstream patches to the mainline kernel. >> >> Did you try it? I don't thhink this is a mandatory requirement. >> For example, U-Boot also does not upstream any kernel patches. >> > > I agree, we should give that a try [1]. Philippe, would you do as > mailing list hoster or should I (and then ask you to sync with them > regarding the archive)? > > Jan > > [1] https://korg.docs.kernel.org/lore.html Ok, option #2 is fine by me. I'll provide the sanitized archive when asked to. -- Philippe.