From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHi, man-pages] mount_namespaces.7: More clearly explain "locked mounts"
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:03:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1et1io8.fsf@disp2133> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210813220120.502058-1-mtk.manpages@gmail.com> (Michael Kerrisk's message of "Sat, 14 Aug 2021 00:01:20 +0200")
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> writes:
> For a long time, this manual page has had a brief discussion of
> "locked" mounts, without clearly saying what this concept is, or
> why it exists. Expand the discussion with an explanation of what
> locked mounts are, why mounts are locked, and some examples of the
> effect of locking.
>
> Thanks to Christian Brauner for a lot of help in understanding
> these details.
>
> Reported-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Hello Eric and others,
>
> After some quite helpful info from Chrstian Brauner, I've expanded
> the discussion of locked mounts (a concept I didn't really have a
> good grasp on) in the mount_namespaces(7) manual page. I would be
> grateful to receive review comments, acks, etc., on the patch below.
> Could you take a look please?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> man7/mount_namespaces.7 | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/man7/mount_namespaces.7 b/man7/mount_namespaces.7
> index e3468bdb7..97427c9ea 100644
> --- a/man7/mount_namespaces.7
> +++ b/man7/mount_namespaces.7
> @@ -107,6 +107,62 @@ operation brings across all of the mounts from the original
> mount namespace as a single unit,
> and recursive mounts that propagate between
> mount namespaces propagate as a single unit.)
> +.IP
> +In this context, "may not be separated" means that the mounts
> +are locked so that they may not be individually unmounted.
> +Consider the following example:
> +.IP
> +.RS
> +.in +4n
> +.EX
> +$ \fBsudo mkdir /mnt/dir\fP
> +$ \fBsudo sh \-c \(aqecho "aaaaaa" > /mnt/dir/a\(aq\fP
> +$ \fBsudo mount \-\-bind -o ro /some/path /mnt/dir\fP
> +$ \fBls /mnt/dir\fP # Former contents of directory are invisible
Do we want a more motivating example such as a /proc/sys?
It has been common to mount over /proc files and directories that can be
written to by the global root so that users in a mount namespace may not
touch them.
> +.EE
> +.in
> +.RE
> +.IP
> +The above steps, performed in a more privileged user namespace,
> +have created a (read-only) bind mount that
> +obscures the contents of the directory
> +.IR /mnt/dir .
> +For security reasons, it should not be possible to unmount
> +that mount in a less privileged user namespace,
> +since that would reveal the contents of the directory
> +.IR /mnt/dir .
> +.IP
> +Suppose we now create a new mount namespace
> +owned by a (new) subordinate user namespace.
> +The new mount namespace will inherit copies of all of the mounts
> +from the previous mount namespace.
> +However, those mounts will be locked because the new mount namespace
> +is owned by a less privileged user namespace.
> +Consequently, an attempt to unmount the mount fails:
> +.IP
> +.RS
> +.in +4n
> +.EX
> +$ \fBsudo unshare \-\-user \-\-map\-root\-user \-\-mount \e\fP
> + \fBstrace \-o /tmp/log \e\fP
> + \fBumount /mnt/dir\fP
> +umount: /mnt/dir: not mounted.
> +$ \fBgrep \(aq^umount\(aq /tmp/log\fP
> +umount2("/mnt/dir", 0) = \-1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> +.EE
> +.in
> +.RE
> +.IP
> +The error message from
> +.BR mount (8)
> +is a little confusing, but the
> +.BR strace (1)
> +output reveals that the underlying
> +.BR umount2 (2)
> +system call failed with the error
> +.BR EINVAL ,
> +which is the error that the kernel returns to indicate that
> +the mount is locked.
Do you want to mention that you can unmount the entire subtree? Either
with pivot_root if it is locked to "/" or with
"umount -l /path/to/propagated/directory".
> .IP *
> The
> .BR mount (2)
> @@ -128,6 +184,23 @@ settings become locked
> when propagated from a more privileged to
> a less privileged mount namespace,
> and may not be changed in the less privileged mount namespace.
> +.IP
> +This point can be illustrated by a continuation of the previous example.
> +In that example, the bind mount was marked as read-only.
> +For security reasons,
> +it should not be possible to make the mount writable in
> +a less privileged namespace, and indeed the kernel prevents this,
> +as illustrated by the following:
> +.IP
> +.RS
> +.in +4n
> +.EX
> +$ \fBsudo unshare \-\-user \-\-map\-root\-user \-\-mount \e\fP
> + \fBmount \-o remount,rw /mnt/dir\fP
> +mount: /mnt/dir: permission denied.
> +.EE
> +.in
> +.RE
> .IP *
> .\" (As of 3.18-rc1 (in Al Viro's 2014-08-30 vfs.git#for-next tree))
> A file or directory that is a mount point in one namespace that is not
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-16 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 22:01 [PATCHi, man-pages] mount_namespaces.7: More clearly explain "locked mounts" Michael Kerrisk
2021-08-14 8:09 ` Christian Brauner
2021-08-16 16:03 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-08-17 3:12 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2021-08-17 14:06 ` Christian Brauner
2021-08-19 0:24 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2021-08-17 15:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-08-19 0:22 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1et1io8.fsf@disp2133 \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.