All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list\:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/11] selftests: Remove tools/lib/bpf from include path
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:49:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1zyquof.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bzba5FHN_iN52qRiGisRcauur1FqDY545EwE+RVR-nFvQA@mail.gmail.com>

Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:28 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>>
>> To make sure no new files are introduced that doesn't include the bpf/
>> prefix in its #include, remove tools/lib/bpf from the include path
>> entirely.
>>
>> Instead, we introduce a new header files directory under the scratch tools/
>> dir, and add a rule to run the 'install_headers' rule from libbpf to have a
>> full set of consistent libbpf headers in $(OUTPUT)/tools/include/bpf, and
>> then use $(OUTPUT)/tools/include as the include path for selftests.
>>
>> For consistency we also make sure we put all the scratch build files from
>> other bpftool and libbpf into tools/build/, so everything stays within
>> selftests/.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore |    1 +
>>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile   |   50 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
>> index 1d14e3ab70be..849be9990ad2 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
>> @@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ test_cpp
>>  /bpf_gcc
>>  /tools
>>  bpf_helper_defs.h
>> +/include/bpf
>
> Isn't the real path (within selftests/bpf) a tools/include/bpf, which
> is already ignored through /tools rule?

Yeah, you're correct. I started out with having it in include/bpf, but
ended up moving it, and guess I forgot to remove the .gitignore. Will fix.

>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> index 1fd7da49bd56..c3fa695bb028 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ CLANG         ?= clang
>>  LLC            ?= llc
>>  LLVM_OBJCOPY   ?= llvm-objcopy
>>  BPF_GCC                ?= $(shell command -v bpf-gcc;)
>> -CFLAGS += -g -Wall -O2 $(GENFLAGS) -I$(CURDIR) -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR)  \
>> -         -I$(BPFDIR) -I$(GENDIR) -I$(TOOLSINCDIR)                      \
>> +CFLAGS += -g -Wall -O2 $(GENFLAGS) -I$(CURDIR) -I$(APIDIR)              \
>> +         -I$(INCLUDE_DIR) -I$(GENDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(TOOLSINCDIR)     \
>>           -Dbpf_prog_load=bpf_prog_test_load                            \
>>           -Dbpf_load_program=bpf_test_load_program
>>  LDLIBS += -lcap -lelf -lz -lrt -lpthread
>> @@ -97,11 +97,15 @@ OVERRIDE_TARGETS := 1
>>  override define CLEAN
>>         $(call msg,CLEAN)
>>         $(RM) -r $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED) $(TEST_GEN_FILES) $(EXTRA_CLEAN)
>> -       $(MAKE) -C $(BPFDIR) OUTPUT=$(OUTPUT)/ clean
>>  endef
>>
>>  include ../lib.mk
>>
>> +SCRATCH_DIR := $(OUTPUT)/tools
>> +BUILD_DIR := $(SCRATCH_DIR)/build
>> +INCLUDE_DIR := $(SCRATCH_DIR)/include
>> +INCLUDE_BPF := $(INCLUDE_DIR)/bpf/bpf.h
>> +
>>  # Define simple and short `make test_progs`, `make test_sysctl`, etc targets
>>  # to build individual tests.
>>  # NOTE: Semicolon at the end is critical to override lib.mk's default static
>> @@ -120,7 +124,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read: urandom_read.c
>>         $(call msg,BINARY,,$@)
>>         $(CC) -o $@ $< -Wl,--build-id
>>
>> -$(OUTPUT)/test_stub.o: test_stub.c
>> +$(OUTPUT)/test_stub.o: test_stub.c $(INCLUDE_BPF)
>>         $(call msg,CC,,$@)
>>         $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $<
>>
>> @@ -129,7 +133,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/runqslower: force
>>         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(TOOLSDIR)/bpf/runqslower           \
>>                     OUTPUT=$(CURDIR)/tools/ VMLINUX_BTF=$(abspath ../../../../vmlinux)
>>
>> -BPFOBJ := $(OUTPUT)/libbpf.a
>> +BPFOBJ := $(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf/libbpf.a
>>
>>  $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED): $(OUTPUT)/test_stub.o $(BPFOBJ)
>>
>> @@ -155,17 +159,23 @@ force:
>>  DEFAULT_BPFTOOL := $(OUTPUT)/tools/sbin/bpftool
>>  BPFTOOL ?= $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL)
>>
>> -$(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL): force
>> -       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras)  -C $(BPFTOOLDIR)                       \
>> +$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf $(BUILD_DIR)/bpftool $(INCLUDE_DIR):
>> +       $(call msg,MKDIR,,$@)
>> +       mkdir -p $@
>> +
>> +$(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL): force $(BUILD_DIR)/bpftool
>
> directories should be included as order-only dependencies (after | )

OK.

>> +       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras)  -C $(BPFTOOLDIR)         \
>> +                   OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/bpftool/                        \
>>                     prefix= DESTDIR=$(OUTPUT)/tools/ install
>>
>> -$(BPFOBJ): force
>> -       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(BPFDIR) OUTPUT=$(OUTPUT)/
>> +$(BPFOBJ): force $(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf
>
> same
>
>> +       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(BPFDIR) \
>> +               OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf/
>>
>> -BPF_HELPERS := $(OUTPUT)/bpf_helper_defs.h $(wildcard $(BPFDIR)/bpf_*.h)
>> -$(OUTPUT)/bpf_helper_defs.h: $(BPFOBJ)
>> -       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(BPFDIR)                            \
>> -                   OUTPUT=$(OUTPUT)/ $(OUTPUT)/bpf_helper_defs.h
>> +BPF_HELPERS := $(wildcard $(BPFDIR)/bpf_*.h) $(INCLUDE_BPF)
>
> Shouldn't all BPF_HELPERS come from $(INCLUDE_DIR)/bpf now?
>
>> +$(INCLUDE_BPF): force $(BPFOBJ)
>
> And this can be more properly a $(BPF_HELPERS): force $(BPFOBJ)?
>
>> +       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(BPFDIR) install_headers \
>> +               OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf/ DESTDIR=$(SCRATCH_DIR) prefix=
>>
>>  # Get Clang's default includes on this system, as opposed to those seen by
>>  # '-target bpf'. This fixes "missing" files on some architectures/distros,
>> @@ -185,8 +195,8 @@ MENDIAN=$(if $(IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN),-mlittle-endian,-mbig-endian)
>>
>>  CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES = $(call get_sys_includes,$(CLANG))
>>  BPF_CFLAGS = -g -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) $(MENDIAN)                  \
>> -            -I$(OUTPUT) -I$(CURDIR) -I$(CURDIR)/include/uapi           \
>> -            -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(BPFDIR) -I$(abspath $(OUTPUT)/../usr/include)
>> +            -I$(INCLUDE_DIR) -I$(CURDIR) -I$(CURDIR)/include/uapi      \
>> +            -I$(APIDIR) -I$(abspath $(OUTPUT)/../usr/include)
>>
>>  CLANG_CFLAGS = $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>                -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types
>> @@ -306,7 +316,7 @@ $(TRUNNER_TEST_OBJS): $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/%.test.o:                   \
>>                       $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_HDRS)                             \
>>                       $(TRUNNER_BPF_OBJS)                               \
>>                       $(TRUNNER_BPF_SKELS)                              \
>> -                     $$(BPFOBJ) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
>> +                     $$(BPFOBJ) $$(INCLUDE_BPF) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
>
> singling out $(INCLUDE_BPF) looks weird? But I think $(BPFOBJ)
> achieves the same effect, so this change can be probably dropped? Same
> below.

I was having some trouble getting the dependency order right here.
$(INCLUDE_BPF) depends on $(BPFOBJ), not the other way around. May be
fixable though, I'll take another look.

-Toke


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16 13:22 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] tools: Use consistent libbpf include paths everywhere Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/11] samples/bpf: Don't try to remove user's homedir on clean Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] tools/bpf/runqslower: Fix override option for VMLINUX_BTF Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 18:54   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-17  9:44     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] selftests: Pass VMLINUX_BTF to runqslower Makefile Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 18:56   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/11] tools/runqslower: Use consistent include paths for libbpf Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 21:56   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-17  9:46     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] selftests: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 21:57   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/11] bpftool: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 22:21   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/11] perf: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 22:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/11] samples/bpf: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 22:23   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/11] selftests: Remove tools/lib/bpf from include path Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 22:41   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-16 23:05     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-17  9:50       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-17  9:49     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/11] tools/runqslower: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 22:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/11] libbpf: Fix include of bpf_helpers.h when libbpf is installed on system Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-01-16 22:43   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-01-17  4:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] tools: Use consistent libbpf include paths everywhere Alexei Starovoitov
2020-01-17  8:57   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-01-17  9:58     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r1zyquof.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.