From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH libdrm] xf86drm: Make drmNodeIsDRM() public.
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:59:21 -0800
Message-ID: <87r2eflyau.fsf@anholt.net>
References: <20181120043008.3576-1-christopher.halse.rogers@canonical.com>
 <CACvgo53tAaufenq_nVPeitSe9S==DaFZUww0X5ZgmZ+4NT8y=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0470306118=="
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from anholt.net (anholt.net [50.246.234.109])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68866E5D9
 for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:59:23 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <CACvgo53tAaufenq_nVPeitSe9S==DaFZUww0X5ZgmZ+4NT8y=Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>, christopher.halse.rogers@canonical.com
Cc: ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

--===============0470306118==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Christopher,
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 04:30, Christopher James Halse Rogers
> <christopher.halse.rogers@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have wanted this code in Mir, so it's plausibly useful elsewhere,
>> particularly if the DRM device major number is going to become
>> dynamic.
>>
> Can you elaborate/link to the code that uses the major/minor?
> Fiddling with those manually is rather error prone most often than not.

Yeah, I think this shouldn't be part of the API.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0Scb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============0470306118==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg==

--===============0470306118==--