Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 3/7] qemu_init_vcpu: add a new Error parameter to propagate

[Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>]

Fei Li <fli@suse.com> writes:

> On 10/11/2018 09:19 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Fei Li <fli@suse.com> writes:
>>
>>> The caller of qemu_init_vcpu() already passed the **errp to handle
>> Which caller?  There are many.  Or do you mean "The callers"?
> Oh, sorry, I mean "The callers" :)
>>
>>> errors. In view of this, add a new Error parameter to the following
>>> call trace to propagate the error and let the further caller check it.
>> Which "call trace"?
> Actually, I want to say all functions called by qemu_init_vcpu()..
>>
>>> Besides, make qemu_init_vcpu() return a Boolean value to let its
>>> callers know whether it succeeds.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fei Li <fli@suse.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c      |  2 +-
>>>   cpus.c                          | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>   include/qom/cpu.h               |  2 +-
>>>   target/alpha/cpu.c              |  4 +++-
>>>   target/arm/cpu.c                |  4 +++-
>>>   target/cris/cpu.c               |  4 +++-
>>>   target/hppa/cpu.c               |  4 +++-
>>>   target/i386/cpu.c               |  4 +++-
>>>   target/lm32/cpu.c               |  4 +++-
>>>   target/m68k/cpu.c               |  4 +++-
>>>   target/microblaze/cpu.c         |  4 +++-
>>>   target/mips/cpu.c               |  4 +++-
>>>   target/moxie/cpu.c              |  4 +++-
>>>   target/nios2/cpu.c              |  4 +++-
>>>   target/openrisc/cpu.c           |  4 +++-
>>>   target/ppc/translate_init.inc.c |  4 +++-
>>>   target/riscv/cpu.c              |  4 +++-
>>>   target/s390x/cpu.c              |  4 +++-
>>>   target/sh4/cpu.c                |  4 +++-
>>>   target/sparc/cpu.c              |  4 +++-
>>>   target/tilegx/cpu.c             |  4 +++-
>>>   target/tricore/cpu.c            |  4 +++-
>>>   target/unicore32/cpu.c          |  4 +++-
>>>   target/xtensa/cpu.c             |  4 +++-
>>>   24 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c b/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c
>>> index a32b4496af..38f6b928d4 100644
>>> --- a/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c
>>> +++ b/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c
>>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ void cpu_resume(CPUState *cpu)
>>>   {
>>>   }
>>>   -void qemu_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>>> +bool qemu_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
>>>   {
>> You need to return a value here.  Sure you compile-tested this?
> Oops! I forget the TCG case.. The `return true` should be added.
> Thanks for pointing this out!

You're welcome.

>>>   }
>>>   diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
[...]
>> I see how you changed the code to pass an Error from the
>> qemu_FOO_start_vcpu() through qemu_init_vcpu() to its callers.  I can't
>> see how such errors can be created.  Without a way to create any, the
>> patch is pointless.  What am I missing?
> This patch is also the pre-patch for the updated qemu_thread_create()
> in patch 7/7
> just as I explained in patch 2/7 [Issue1].

Patches that make little sense on their own, but pave the way for a
later patch are okay.  But they should explain that purpose in their
commit message.