Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Hyper-V: paravirtualized remote TLB flushing and hypercall improvements

[Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>]

Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes:

> * Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Changes since v9:
>> > - Rebase to 4.13-rc3.
>> > - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no
>> >   functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a different tree
>> >   (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right).
>> > - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg KH]
>> > - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in
>> >   hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko]
>> > - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2
>> >   reported by kbuild test robot (#include <asm/io.h>)
>> > - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9.
>> 
>> Thomas, Ingo, Greg,
>> 
>> do I get it right that the intention is to take this series through x86
>> tree? (See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2561174.html) If so,
>> is there anything else I need to do to get it accepted?
>
> Yeah, the patches are arch/x86/-heavy, so that would be the ideal workflow - it's 
> just that the series coincided with x86 maintainers vacation time!
>
> I've picked them up now into tip:x86/platform (they look good to me) and will push 
> them out after some testing.
>

Great, thanks!

-- 
  Vitaly