From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dT2v3-0006sD-1m for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:17:54 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/3] ath10k usb support Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:17:29 +0000 Message-ID: <87r2xtexgn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1495312410-9937-1-git-send-email-erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1495312410-9937-1-git-send-email-erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> (Erik Stromdahl's message of "Sat, 20 May 2017 22:33:27 +0200") Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Erik Stromdahl Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Erik Stromdahl writes: > This is the 2nd version of the ath10k USB RFC. There are only minor updates > since last version. > > The main difference when compared to the previous RFC is that the > high latency stuff that is common between USB and SDIO has been moved out > of this patchset and into another (separate) patchset. > > I was actually thinking about squashing all the patches into one, but > decided not to do so since I wanted usb.h, usb.c and the update Kconfig + > Makefile in one separate patch. > > Perhaps patch 1 and 2 should be squashed? > > Erik Stromdahl (3): > ath10k: various usb related definitions > ath10k: different fw file names for usb > ath10k: add initial USB support This looks good. I'll again do some cosmetic changes and submit v2 as proper patch. Sorry for taking so long with this. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from alexa-out.qualcomm.com ([129.46.98.28]:15429 "EHLO alexa-out-lv-02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752045AbdGFJRh (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:17:37 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Erik Stromdahl CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/3] ath10k usb support Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:17:29 +0000 Message-ID: <87r2xtexgn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20170706_111744_919489_02D23815) References: <1495312410-9937-1-git-send-email-erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1495312410-9937-1-git-send-email-erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> (Erik Stromdahl's message of "Sat, 20 May 2017 22:33:27 +0200") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Erik Stromdahl writes: > This is the 2nd version of the ath10k USB RFC. There are only minor updat= es > since last version. > > The main difference when compared to the previous RFC is that the > high latency stuff that is common between USB and SDIO has been moved out > of this patchset and into another (separate) patchset. > > I was actually thinking about squashing all the patches into one, but > decided not to do so since I wanted usb.h, usb.c and the update Kconfig + > Makefile in one separate patch. > > Perhaps patch 1 and 2 should be squashed? > > Erik Stromdahl (3): > ath10k: various usb related definitions > ath10k: different fw file names for usb > ath10k: add initial USB support This looks good. I'll again do some cosmetic changes and submit v2 as proper patch. Sorry for taking so long with this. --=20 Kalle Valo=