From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 11:41:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r2zzagga.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494018126-30190-4-git-send-email-jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
On Sat, 06 May 2017, Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts
> to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't
> fast link training as per the DP spec. These changes were
>
> 5fa836a9d859 ("drm/i915: DP link training optimization")
> 4e96c97742f4 ("drm/i915: eDP link training optimization")
>
> which were eventually hand-reverted by
>
> 34511dce4 ("drm/i915: Revert DisplayPort fast link training feature")
>
> in kernel 4.7-rc4. The eDP pieces of the above revert, however, had some
> very bad side-effects on PSR functionality on Skylake. The issue at
> hand is that when PSR exits i915 briefly emits TP1 followed by TP2/3
> (depending on the original link configuration) in order to quickly get
> the source and sink back in synchronization across the link before handing
> control back to the i915. There's an assumption that none of the link
> configuration information has changed (and thus it's still valid) since the
> last full link training operation. The revert above was identified via a
> bisect as the cause of some of Skylake's PSR woes. This patch, largely
> based on
>
> commit 4e96c97742f4201edf1b0f8e1b1b6b2ac6ff33e7
> Author: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Date: Wed Apr 29 09:17:39 2015 +0300
> drm/i915: eDP link training optimization
>
> puts the eDP portions of this patch back in place. None of the flickering
> issues that spurred the revert have been seen, and I suspect the real
> culprits here were addressed by some of the recent link training changes
> that Manasi has implemented, and PSR on Skylake is definitely more happy
> with these changes in-place.
I'm weary of all the back and forth wrt PSR and DP, and wary of creating
new ones. Would it make sense to restrict this patch to PSR?
BR,
Jani.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi D Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Fixes: 34511dce4 ("drm/i915: Revert DisplayPort fast link training feature")
> Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index d46f72d..06b8bd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static const int default_rates[] = { 162000, 270000, 540000 };
> * If a CPU or PCH DP output is attached to an eDP panel, this function
> * will return true, and false otherwise.
> */
> -static bool is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +bool is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>
> @@ -4690,6 +4690,7 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> intel_dp->max_link_rate = intel_dp_max_common_rate(intel_dp);
>
> intel_dp->reset_link_params = false;
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> }
>
> intel_dp_print_rates(intel_dp);
> @@ -6052,6 +6053,7 @@ intel_dp_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> intel_dp_set_source_rates(intel_dp);
>
> intel_dp->reset_link_params = true;
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> intel_dp->pps_pipe = INVALID_PIPE;
> intel_dp->active_pipe = INVALID_PIPE;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index b79c1c0..60233e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ static bool
> intel_dp_reset_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> uint8_t dp_train_pat)
> {
> - memset(intel_dp->train_set, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->train_set));
> + if (!intel_dp->train_set_valid)
> + memset(intel_dp->train_set, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->train_set));
> intel_dp_set_signal_levels(intel_dp);
> return intel_dp_set_link_train(intel_dp, dp_train_pat);
> }
> @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1 |
> DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to enable link training\n");
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -174,21 +176,25 @@ intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> if (!intel_dp_get_link_status(intel_dp, link_status)) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to get link status\n");
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> return false;
> }
>
> if (drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count)) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("clock recovery OK\n");
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = is_edp(intel_dp);
> return true;
> }
>
> if (voltage_tries == 5) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Same voltage tried 5 times\n");
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> return false;
> }
>
> if (max_vswing_tries == 1) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max Voltage Swing reached\n");
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -198,6 +204,7 @@ intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_get_adjust_train(intel_dp, link_status);
> if (!intel_dp_update_link_train(intel_dp)) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to update link training\n");
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -256,6 +263,7 @@ intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> training_pattern |
> DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to start channel equalization\n");
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -296,6 +304,7 @@ intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> /* Try 5 times, else fail and try at lower BW */
> if (tries == 5) {
> intel_dp_dump_link_status(link_status);
> + intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Channel equalization failed 5 times\n");
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 19d0c8f..149d4c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
> struct drm_dp_aux aux;
> enum intel_display_power_domain aux_power_domain;
> uint8_t train_set[4];
> + bool train_set_valid;
> int panel_power_up_delay;
> int panel_power_down_delay;
> int panel_power_cycle_delay;
> @@ -1551,6 +1552,7 @@ bool intel_dp_read_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> bool __intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_dp_desc *desc);
> bool intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +bool is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> int intel_dp_link_required(int pixel_clock, int bpp);
> int intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_clock, int max_lanes);
> bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-08 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-05 21:02 [PATCH 0/4] Kernel PSR Fix-ups Jim Bride
2017-05-05 21:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available Jim Bride
2017-05-08 8:54 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-08 16:52 ` Jim Bride
2017-05-05 21:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Clean-up intel_enable_source_psr1() Jim Bride
2017-05-23 19:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-05-05 21:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP Jim Bride
2017-05-08 8:41 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-05-08 16:59 ` Jim Bride
2017-05-08 13:07 ` Mika Kahola
2017-05-05 21:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/psr: Account for sink CRC raciness on some panels Jim Bride
2017-05-08 9:12 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-08 17:29 ` Jim Bride
2017-05-08 18:05 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-08 19:26 ` Jim Bride
2017-05-05 21:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Kernel PSR Fix-ups Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r2zzagga.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jim.bride@linux.intel.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.