From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:44:25 -0600 Message-ID: <87r363h0jq.fsf@xmission.com> References: <20161122191719.3e438d1e@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161122191719.3e438d1e@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:17:19 +1100") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Eric, > > Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got conflicts in: > > arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c > arch/blackfin/kernel/ptrace.c > arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/ptrace.c > arch/ia64/kernel/ptrace.c > arch/mips/kernel/ptrace32.c > arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace32.c > include/linux/mm.h > kernel/ptrace.c > mm/memory.c > mm/nommu.c > > between commit: > > 442486ec1096 ("mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags") > (and others) > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > 0cabf9a438e1 ("ptrace: Don't allow accessing an undumpable mm") > > from the userns tree. > > I just used the version of the userns tree from next-20161117 for today. > Please merge v4.9-rc2 and fix up the conflicts (or just rebase onto > v4.9-rc2). Will do. Thank you. Eric