From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50897)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1asCFY-0006Hj-OO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:42:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1asCFU-0002ja-II
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:42:12 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37822)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1asCFU-0002jU-Cx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:42:08 -0400
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
References: <1460102035-15972-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<87twjcvz7o.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
	<20160409200141-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<8760voo18x.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
	<20160411142509-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<8760vlq3yg.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:42:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8760vlq3yg.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's message
	of "Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:59:35 +0200")
Message-ID: <87r3e27tsy.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] fw_cfg: RFQDN rules, documentation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Gabriel L . Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:

[...]
> To make forward progress, I recommend to split this patch into an
> uncontroversial and a controversial part.  The uncontroversial part are
> the RFQDN rules.

I offered Michael to do that for him, and he accepted.  Patch is on its
way.