All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Restore inhibiting the load of the	default context
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:57:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r3iuqud1.fsf@riseup.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151210133756.GN29974@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6128 bytes --]

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:24:52PM +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>> >
>> >> Following a GPU reset, we may leave the context in a poorly defined
>> >> state, and reloading from that context will leave the GPU flummoxed. For
>> >> secondary contexts, this will lead to that context being banned - but
>> >> currently it is also causing the default context to become banned,
>> >> leading to turmoil in the shared state.
>> >>
>> >> This is a regression from
>> >>
>> >> commit 6702cf16e0ba8b0129f5aa1b6609d4e9c70bc13b [v4.1]
>> >> Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
>> >> Date:   Mon Mar 16 16:00:58 2015 +0000
>> >>
>> >>     drm/i915: Initialize all contexts
>> >>
>> >> which quietly introduced the removal of the MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT on the
>> >> default context.
>> >>
>> 
>> AFAICT the removal of MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT in that commit seemed
>> justified.  Ben explained that it was needed to fix a pagefault in the
>> default context under certain conditions.  I don't know the details of
>> the original change (Ben CC'ed), but it seems like this would be trading
>> one bug for another?
>
> A bug in a feature that never worked and isn't enabled?
>  
>> Other than that this opens the door again to subtle state leaks between
>> processes, as I learned recently while implementing L3 partitioning in
>> Mesa.  Mesa now changes the L3 configuration in ways that will break
>> assumptions from processes that use the default context (the DDX).  The
>> DDX assumes, for instance, that the URB size is set according to the
>> hardware defaults, but it doesn't actually program the URB size itself,
>> so in a way the DDX relies on MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT *not* to be set for the
>> default context for correct operation.  This commit breaks that
>> assumption and the kernel ABI.
>
> Wrong the ABI is the other way around and has been for 10 years. Note
> the kernel isn't also ensuring that the default context has the default
> hardware values either. The "golden renderstate" also doesn't set all
> defaults and is also a recent introduction.
>
> It changes the ABI back to what it was....

Sounds like a change fully unrelated to fixing the bug on GPU reset.

The ABI change done in 6702cf16e0ba8b0129f5aa1b6609d4e9c70bc13b seemed
legitimate because it made the context state on switch more well-defined
than it used to be, IOW it was a backwards-compatible ABI change because
it couldn't possibly break userspace assumptions.  This change OTOH
breaks an assumption about the kernel ABI done by the DDX now.

>  
>> Mesa has a workaround in place to reduce the likelihood of such leaks,
>> but the solution is far from ideal because it relies on userspace
>> cooperation and had a measurable impact in performance (because it
>> requires userspace to assume the worst-case scenario that the following
>> batch is going to be from a different context with MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT
>> set, so we have to restore the hardware default L3 configuration at the
>> end of every batch even if that's actually not the case), for that
>> reason we would like to drop the userspace workaround in the future at
>> least on v4.1 kernels and newer.
>
> Mesa has workarounds for leaks between hardware contexts, i.e. state
> that is not stored in the context itself. Mesa also has to assume a
> clean slate when setting up the context for the first time, and doesn't
> use the default context itself.
>  

No, the workaround involves restoring state which *is* part of the
hardware context, it just won't get saved and restored with this commit
because of the MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT flag when switching to the DDX'
default context.

>> One more question below.
>> 
>> >> v2: Mark the global default context as uninitialized on GPU reset so
>> >> that the context-local workarounds are reloaded upon re-enabling.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
>> >
>> >> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
>> >> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
>> >> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 6 +++++-
>> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> >> index 43761c5bcaca..f024d5d2c746 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> >> @@ -340,6 +340,10 @@ void i915_gem_context_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>> >>  			i915_gem_context_unreference(lctx);
>> >>  			ring->last_context = NULL;
>> >>  		}
>> >> +
>> >> +		/* Force the GPU state to be reinitialised on enabling */
>> >> +		if (ring->default_context)
>> >> +			ring->default_context->legacy_hw_ctx.initialized = false;
>> >>  	}
>> >>  }
>> >>  
>> >> @@ -708,7 +712,7 @@ static int do_switch(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>> >>  	if (ret)
>> >>  		goto unpin_out;
>> >>  
>> >> -	if (!to->legacy_hw_ctx.initialized) {
>> >> +	if (!to->legacy_hw_ctx.initialized || i915_gem_context_is_default(to)) {
>> 
>> This hunk causes MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT to be set again for the default
>> context regardless of whether a reset happened or not, so it seems
>> unrelated to the rest of your change.  Maybe I'm understanding this
>> wrong but doesn't the !initialized check together with the hunk above
>> already guarantee that MI_RESTORE_INHIBIT will be set after GPU reset,
>> which is what you wanted to achieve?
>
> This is the change to *restore* the kernel ABI. The flag in reset is to
> force the WA LRI to be re-emitted (not for gen6 ofc) as they will not be
> preserved.

Again you don't justify why changing the kernel ABI is required to fix
a GPU reset bug.

> -Chris
>
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 212 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-27 10:07 [PATCH] drm/i915: Restore inhibiting the load of the default context Chris Wilson
2015-11-27 11:32 ` Mika Kuoppala
2015-11-27 13:14   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-27 13:28   ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2015-12-10 10:19     ` Mika Kuoppala
2015-12-10 10:45       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-06 10:07         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-10 13:24       ` Francisco Jerez
2015-12-10 13:37         ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-10 13:57           ` Francisco Jerez [this message]
2015-12-10 14:03           ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r3iuqud1.fsf@riseup.net \
    --to=currojerez@riseup.net \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.