From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Does perf randomize the sampling period? Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:48:49 -0700 Message-ID: <87r3m68ece.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1769534.mDAXVEGQ5L@milian-kdab2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:31730 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753045AbbIJPtj (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:49:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1769534.mDAXVEGQ5L@milian-kdab2> (Milian Wolff's message of "Wed, 09 Sep 2015 17:11:13 +0200") Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Milian Wolff Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Milian Wolff writes: > Hey all, > > does perf randomize its sampling intervals/period to prevent pattern > effects? It does not. Usually you can get most of the benefits of randomization by using a prime period with -c. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only