From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abhishek L Subject: Re: Proposal for a Backport tracker Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 19:08:36 +0530 Message-ID: <87r3qa6of7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <555DC080.8050508@dachary.org> <555DD285.3050204@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:35923 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757015AbbEUNlD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 09:41:03 -0400 Received: by pabts4 with SMTP id ts4so105762362pab.3 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:41:02 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <555DD285.3050204@suse.cz> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nathan Cutler Cc: Loic Dachary , Ceph Development --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nathan Cutler writes: >> * a backport issue is created in the "Backport" tracker and is=20 >> "Related" to the original issue > > Hi Loic: > > I like the idea of having backport tickets in a separate Redmine > subproject/issue tracker. In fact, I would go even a step further and > have separate subprojects for each target version (hammer backports, > firefly backports). Agree with the idea of seperate subproject. Though I'm not having a strong opinion on whether subprojects are needed for each version; probably for issues which have multiple backports ie. backports to both firefly & hammer for instance it might be a little bit more bookkeeping, though from a maintainer standpoint; it is easier having a seperate subproject, so either way is okay.=20 > Having all, e.g. hammer, backports in one place is advantageous in > pretty much every way I can think of: easier to see what has been > done, what needs to be done, easier to search, easier to automate, > less risk of munging something not related to backports... > Agree, from a scripting standpoint, we could develop some tools to ease out the process better, which should it make it easier in backports down the line. > It also has the effect of removing all the backport-related tickets > from the bug tracker(s). > > Nathan =2D-=20 Abhishek --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; name="signature.asc"; description="Digital signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVXd/nAAoJEPnwZB8bZe1fKeIH/2XwRbVh64AI+AisyaBskSIF uVf4DetocqgEOXmzYas235Bql0Sx6QSkGWpOFSiOAJyhdW3pArIuQKMTjkFWT/CJ rK3YCdsMGlytPdhtsSxKJQL1EdcICdHDNiEhlgXrCESMZB5LUIifCgGfALMmpnpR AOd4FQ17IC9OlRn4714jaxTFUWA1SSk+HCnIXqEf+ZP2AiuP+W5gKIr9HycRkAJo eHIgby3XjutJyy40kLCHbh8oVET/aJNeWt1dn051cM1BjyWgnqltcJrAnh6fGD3o 5je/gc6iTpi2sE0pboHKOFkRCFRwakmFHz4uUh9TPfFMJOfOFiMV80LOO0l1DFs= =sX5/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--