All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	"dvaleev@suse.de" <dvaleev@suse.de>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Huangpeng (Peter)" <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] bootdevice: add check in restore_boot_order()
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:32:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r3ucmoth.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CB74BD.80305@huawei.com> (Gonglei's message of "Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:10:37 +0800")

Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> writes:

> On 2015/1/30 20:01, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 2015/1/30 15:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2015/1/30 0:03, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 29.01.15 14:29, arei.gonglei@huawei.com wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If boot order is invaild or is set failed,
>>>>>>> exit qemu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we really want to kill the machine only because the boot device
>>>>>> string doesn't validate?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not all of the situation. If people want to change boot order by qmp/hmp
>>>>> command, it just report an error, please see do_boot_set(). But if the boot
>>>>> order is set in qemu command line, it will exit qemu if the boot
>>>>> device string
>>>>> is invalidate, as this patch's situation, which follow the original
>>>>> processing
>>>>> way (commit ef3adf68).
>>>>
>>>> I think Alex isn't concerned about the monitor command, but what happens
>>>> when boot order "once" is reset to "order" on system reset.
>>>>
>>>> -boot errors should have been detected during command line processing
>>>> (strongly preferred) or initial startup (acceptable).  Detecting
>>>
>>> Yes, and it had done it just like that, please see main() of
>>> vl.c. So, actually
>>> it wouldn't fail in the check of restore_boot_order function's calling.
>>> The only possible fails will happen to call boot_set_handler(). Take
>>> x86 pc machine example, set_boot_dev() callback  may return errors.
>> 
>> I don't like unreachable error messages.  If qemu_boot_set() can't fail
>> in restore_boot_order(), then simply assert it doesn't fail, by passing
>> &error_abort.
>> 
>
> Sorry, I meant the validate_bootdevices() can't fail in restore_boot_order(),
> but boot_set_handler(boot_set_opaque, boot_order, errp) may fail, such as
> set_boot_dev(). For example:
> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -m 4096 -boot
> menu=on,order=nbcdep,once=c -monitor stdio -vnc :0
> QEMU 2.2.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
> (qemu) system_reset
> (qemu) qemu-system-x86_64: Too many boot devices for PC

The value of parameter order should be checked "during command line
processing (strongly preferred) or initial startup (acceptable)" if at
all possible.  Is it possible?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-30 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-29 13:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] bootdevice: two little changes arei.gonglei
2015-01-29 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] bootdevice: remove the check about boot_set_handler arei.gonglei
2015-01-29 16:03   ` Alexander Graf
2015-01-29 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] bootdevice: add check in restore_boot_order() arei.gonglei
2015-01-29 16:03   ` Alexander Graf
2015-01-30  0:47     ` Gonglei
2015-01-30  7:46       ` Markus Armbruster
2015-01-30  8:20         ` Gonglei
2015-01-30 12:01           ` Markus Armbruster
2015-01-30 12:10             ` Gonglei
2015-01-30 12:32               ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2015-01-30 12:43                 ` Gonglei
2015-02-02  9:37                   ` Markus Armbruster
2015-02-03  1:47                     ` Gonglei
2015-02-03  7:49                       ` Markus Armbruster
2015-02-03  8:52                         ` Gonglei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r3ucmoth.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=dvaleev@suse.de \
    --cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.