From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yoshinori Sato Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Revert h8300 archtecture Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:05:25 +0900 Message-ID: <87r3umj1oq.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> References: <87mw5ckpsz.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> <87bnlsvjce.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> <19300.1421838158@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <32417.1421868981@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mail2.asahi-net.or.jp ([202.224.39.198]:38299 "EHLO mail2.asahi-net.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750888AbbAVPF1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:05:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <32417.1421868981@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Howells Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org At Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:36:21 +0000, David Howells wrote: > > Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > > I using binutils-2.25 and gcc-4.9.2. > > Excellent! I maintain the cross-binutils and cross-gcc rpm sets for Fedora. > I've been compiling h8300 with h8300-elf. Should I be using h8300-linux > instead? h8300-linux don't have compatibility on h8300-elf. If it's stand alone binary, I think it's better to use h8300-elf. I upload to git repository. git://git.pf.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/y/ys/ysato/binutils_gdb.git ysato-h8300 git://git.pf.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/y/ys/ysato/gcc.git ysato-h8300 > David -- Yoshinori Sato