From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964937Ab3CLXEP (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:04:15 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:33078 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933804Ab3CLXEM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:04:12 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Larry Baker Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , , , David Miller References: <20130312223245.109098379@linuxfoundation.org> <20130312223247.449652622@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:04:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Larry Baker's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:52:19 -0700") Message-ID: <87r4jkjk4c.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/MLGE8I/4kwYe7Ydy9uwswBDqc53buXtg= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 208.54.5.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -3.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Larry Baker X-Spam-Relay-Country: Subject: Re: [ 20/21] decnet: Fix disappearing sysctl entries X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:26:46 -0700) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Larry Baker writes: > Greg, > > Will there also be a 2.6-stable patch (Eric's first submission)?  My CentOS 6.3 > systems still use 2.6 kernels. Larry what is in CentOS is for the CentOS maintainers to determine. Last I checked they followed RHEL and RHEL seems to have so little interest in decnet that the module isn't even built. Pushing it to the patch to -stable makes the patch available to them if they want to pick up the bugfix. Beyond that if you look at https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/log/?id=refs/tags/v2.6.32.60 https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/log/?id=refs/tags/v2.6.34.14 You can see that it is Willy Tarreau that makes releases for 2.6.32.y and it is Paul Gortmaker that make releases releases for 2.6.34.y So I don't expect Greg KH has anything to do with those kernels anymore. Eric