From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 0/5] XFRM,IPv6: Removal of RH2/HAO from IPsec-protected MIPv6 traffic
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:33:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r5gdtuxv.fsf@small.ssi.corp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100928.133849.112575548.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:38:49 -0700 (PDT)")
Hi,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> Try again, this time with ipv6 modular:
>
> net/built-in.o: In function `xfrm_input_addr_check':
> /home/davem/src/GIT/net-next-2.6/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:115: undefined reference to `xfrm6_input_addr_check'
>
> You can't put xfrm6_input_addr_check into the ipv6.o object build if you want to
> call it from the generic xfrm stack which is always built statically.
>
> Put this and xfrm4_input_addr_check where it belongs, as an afinfo->op()
Before following the (dumb) #ifdef path, I was about to do that but
worried about the penalty of the additional xfrm_state_get/put_afinfo()
calls on each packet I was about to add. Should I just reduce my amount
of coffee or is it a valid concern?
Cheers,
a+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-28 15:53 [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 0/5] XFRM,IPv6: Removal of RH2/HAO from IPsec-protected MIPv6 traffic Arnaud Ebalard
2010-09-28 15:54 ` [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 1/5] XFRM,IPv6: Remove xfrm_spi_hash() dependency on destination address Arnaud Ebalard
2010-09-28 15:54 ` [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 2/5] XFRM,IPv6: Introduce receive sockopts to access IRO remapped src/dst addresses Arnaud Ebalard
2010-09-28 15:54 ` [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 3/5] XFRM,IPv6: Add IRO src/dst address remapping XFRM types and i/o handlers Arnaud Ebalard
2010-09-28 15:54 ` [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 4/5] XFRM,IPv6: Add IRO remapping hook in xfrm_input() Arnaud Ebalard
2010-09-28 15:54 ` [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 5/5] XFRM,IPv6: Add IRO remapping capability via socket ancillary data path Arnaud Ebalard
2010-09-28 20:38 ` [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6 0/5] XFRM,IPv6: Removal of RH2/HAO from IPsec-protected MIPv6 traffic David Miller
2010-09-28 21:33 ` Arnaud Ebalard [this message]
2010-09-28 21:40 ` David Miller
2010-09-29 9:04 ` Arnaud Ebalard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r5gdtuxv.fsf@small.ssi.corp \
--to=arno@natisbad.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.