From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: [Devel] [RFC] user-cr: Routing information in userspace Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 11:09:45 -0700 Message-ID: <87r5kua8ba.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> References: <1274884956-21005-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <20100529031349.GA10541@nibiru.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100529031349.GA10541-q9I3ByPDOfiE+EvaaNYduQ@public.gmane.org> (Enrico Weigelt's message of "Sat\, 29 May 2010 05\:13\:50 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: weigelt-EU+a56NjgY8@public.gmane.org Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org EW> I'd prefer the routing tables being available via sysfs EW> (eg. /sys/net/ipv4/routes). Containers could live under their own EW> subdirectory (eg. /sys/containers//). Well, that's a bit of extra work. IIRC, the multiple routing table implementations converge at about the RTNL layer, making it rather difficult to expose them via another interface. Regardless, it wouldn't change this patch set but by a couple of lines. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org