From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6482725B1CB; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755533804; cv=none; b=UNjuhgC1VYTXTSYgEqzPbA0I3cleoz/YORd52PPIT6G5tL91zZxqXKurdUVLMuu0J4oFiXFAMlLwZg197oW1fTRo5BZ2NjRNM8wri5BfJsxbTP2IXxvrqVf1DldgXggaunjAIw0dkY8Oi9bgkxz+k2chTdUDR3AOoeZf5P2x0Ck= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755533804; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+KreY6XCVUhqfgIGGcQQcVGaWgajloEjSzZ+NQsv0Bk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DFrHUDnkLGx81e+jrqCLk+LQKXiBstBLu9kaLdcGauFat7DKiaCp4543ULqtDOtNPu4/TnFCvw5XWc5fQ6wY9+jFB6L7k4wBsTNrLeIs2HJUlT405IzJ6hjWLGKPsFI9It67TiJG3E25Zsu+lKUd9b2cau8EIBGRJWOT7gppbXU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=DKq8OlQs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="DKq8OlQs" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 29B6A40AB4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1755533802; bh=Ki3AMnJXQIVgxf0vfWmzLXaMaAZehzEkoGm5efNzOvg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=DKq8OlQst1vmDzpKS8Gn4N8tQBC1USZWkeAnosxd15GskYHbD3PcVcKCHtXdCFAIt GxTVMyP503mr8NEv3ZUvk3935awdgT1rvbThRfrX+5q85vh/vaT27fA9C0doSpxFTc jZ6HGrZWDrifUsTxOO6AKDn2VBqF3EP7cXK2PIOn9jnhgMHjAeRaQypBYuUxinU4j0 WJ2QwuVrGotqX9qz+VEm36d3/giiTAZPxsTuJB1KODGvfMDb1hUCfEn1/xWYV6RslJ e6q7RI2XstLBwpNBA2gPHxy+m5SQUBpRM6263qi4rh8mVjdg78YKZA0PXvxk0xpPe5 Qv+dZ6K2876BA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29B6A40AB4; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:16:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev Cc: Boqun Feng , Clark Williams , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , John Ogness , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Valentin Schneider , Waiman Long , Will Deacon , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Documentation: Add real-time to core-api In-Reply-To: <20250815093858.930751-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <20250815093858.930751-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20250815093858.930751-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:16:41 -0600 Message-ID: <87seho8v12.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: One nit: > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst b/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..50d994a31e11c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +======================== > +Significant differences > +======================== That heading text will appear in various places, including in the rendering of your new index.rst file. In such a setting, "significant differences" doesn't give a lot of information. Something like "How realtime kernels differ" would be better, IMO. Otherwise, this all looks good to me. Did you want me to pick it up, or did you have another path in mind for this work? Thanks, jon