From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To: Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@amd.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave.jiang@intel.com, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dmaengine: dmatest: Fix dmatest waiting less when interrupted
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:13:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87senhoq1k.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878qpa13fe.fsf@AUSNATLYNCH.amd.com>
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@amd.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com> writes:
>> Change the "wait for operation finish" logic to take interrupts into
>> account.
>>
>> When using dmatest with idxd DMA engine, it's possible that during
>> longer tests, the interrupt notifying the finish of an operation
>> happens during wait_event_freezable_timeout(), which causes dmatest to
>> cleanup all the resources, some of which might still be in use.
>>
>> This fix ensures that the wait logic correctly handles interrupts,
>> preventing premature cleanup of resources.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202502171134.8c403348-lkp@intel.com
>
> Given the report at the URL above I'm struggling to follow the rationale
> for this change. It looks like a use-after-free in idxd while
> resetting/unbinding the device, and I can't see how changing whether
> dmatest threads perform freezeable waits would change this.
>
I think that the short version is that the reproducition script triggers
different problems on different platforms/configurations.
The solution I proposed fixes a problem I was seeing on a SPR system, on
a GNR system (that I was only able to get later) I see something more similar
to this particular splat (currently working on the fix).
Seeing this question, I realize that I should have added a note to the
commit detailing this.
So I am planning on proposing two (this and another) fixes for the same
report, hoping that it's not that confusing/unusual.
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 23:00 [PATCH v1] dmaengine: dmatest: Fix dmatest waiting less when interrupted Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-03-05 23:14 ` Dave Jiang
2025-03-10 21:06 ` Vinod Koul
2025-03-12 18:58 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-12 22:13 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes [this message]
2025-03-13 14:10 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-13 16:36 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-03-13 21:21 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-13 23:29 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-03-14 21:35 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-14 22:24 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-04-02 13:45 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-04-03 3:44 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-04-03 16:24 ` Nathan Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87senhoq1k.fsf@intel.com \
--to=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan.lynch@amd.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.