All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luís Henriques" <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix memory leaks in ext4_fname_{setup_filename,prepare_lookup}
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 09:58:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sf90v6xk.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803041918.GA1218@sol.localdomain> (Eric Biggers's message of "Wed, 2 Aug 2023 21:19:18 -0700")

Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Luís Henriques wrote:
>> If casefolding the filename fails, we'll be leaking fscrypt_buf name.
>
> fscrypt_buf => fscrypt_name
>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/crypto.c b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
>> index e20ac0654b3f..3c05c7f3415b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/crypto.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ int ext4_fname_setup_filename(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *iname,
>>	struct fscrypt_name name;
>>	int err;
>>
>>	err = fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, iname, lookup, &name);
>>	if (err)
>>		return err;
>>
>>	ext4_fname_from_fscrypt_name(fname, &name);
>>
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>>  	err = ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(dir, iname, fname);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		fscrypt_free_filename(&name);
>>  #endif
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>> @@ -51,6 +53,8 @@ int ext4_fname_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>>	struct fscrypt_name name;
>>	int err;
>>
>>	err = fscrypt_prepare_lookup(dir, dentry, &name);
>>	if (err)
>>		return err;
>>
>>	ext4_fname_from_fscrypt_name(fname, &name);
>>
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>>  	err = ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, fname);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		fscrypt_free_filename(&name);
>>  #endif
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>
> This works, but it's a bit weird that the freeing happens on the original struct
> fscrypt_name after it has already been "moved" to the struct ext4_filename by
> ext4_fname_from_fscrypt_name().  That leaves a dangling pointer in the struct
> ext4_filename.  Maybe you should call ext4_fname_free_filename() instead, even
> though it would do some unnecessary work?

That makes sense, specially because fname is a parameter and it's probably
a good idea to clean-up everything before returning an error.  Thanks.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-03  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02  9:49 [PATCH v2] ext4: fix memory leaks in ext4_fname_{setup_filename,prepare_lookup} Luís Henriques
2023-08-03  4:19 ` Eric Biggers
2023-08-03  8:58   ` Luís Henriques [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sf90v6xk.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.