From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Cc: pedro@palves.net, tom@tromey.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: How to backtrace an separate stack?
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:49:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfrtakce.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YiCk+NNtAGQPhyK5@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (Stefan Hajnoczi via Gdb's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:22:32 +0000")
* Stefan Hajnoczi via Gdb:
> The QEMU emulator uses coroutines with separate stacks. It can be
> challenging to debug coroutines that have yielded because GDB is not
> aware of them (no thread is currently executing them).
>
> QEMU has a GDB Python script that helps. It "creates" a stack frame for
> a given coroutine by temporarily setting register values and then using
> the "bt" command. This works on a live process under ptrace control but
> not for coredumps where registers can't be set.
>
> Here is the script (or see the bottom of this email for an inline copy
> of the relevant code):
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/scripts/qemugdb/coroutine.py
>
> I hoped that "select-frame address ADDRESS" could be used instead so
> this would work on coredumps too. Unfortunately "select-frame" only
> searches stack frames that GDB is already aware of, so it cannot be used
> to backtrace coroutine stacks.
>
> Is there a way to backtrace a stack at an arbitrary address in GDB?
I'm a bit surprised by this. Conceptually, why would GDB need to know
about stack boundaries? Is there some heuristic to detect broken
frames?
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 11:22 How to backtrace an separate stack? Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-07 10:49 ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-08 9:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-07 14:49 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-03-07 17:30 ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-09 10:06 ` Florian Weimer
2022-03-09 19:50 ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-07 16:58 ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-07 17:18 ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-08 8:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-14 20:30 ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-15 14:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-18 21:13 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfrtakce.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.