diff for duplicates of <87sfxezcjp.fsf@redhat.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 8e872bf..6be3f65 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -59,3 +59,8 @@ Checking on each config space access would be enough then. I think any driver that does something that is not config space access, status access, or feature bit handling without VERSION_1 being set is neccessarily legacy? Does that really need special handling? + +_______________________________________________ +Virtualization mailing list +Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org +https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0b673a1..2140d0d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -12,15 +12,14 @@ "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] virtio: write back features before verify\0" "Date\0Wed, 06 Oct 2021 12:13:14 +0200\0" "To\0Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>\0" - "Cc\0Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>" - Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> - virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + "Cc\0linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" markver@us.ibm.com Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - linux-s390@vger.kernel.org - " qemu-devel@nongnu.org\0" + qemu-devel@nongnu.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org + Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> + " Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 04 2021, \"Michael S. Tsirkin\" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:\n" @@ -83,6 +82,11 @@ "\n" "I think any driver that does something that is not config space access,\n" "status access, or feature bit handling without VERSION_1 being set is\n" - neccessarily legacy? Does that really need special handling? + "neccessarily legacy? Does that really need special handling?\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "Virtualization mailing list\n" + "Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" + https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization -ec2a3cd1d7454cd00571f8fe8bb464a908f9619ad1e783ab71c0e266473be0c2 +9ba0a6db39c0642bf91a9004ae4c412990789fed80e678ab6fe187bb54226fd8
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 0b673a1..1b8c01d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -12,15 +12,15 @@ "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] virtio: write back features before verify\0" "Date\0Wed, 06 Oct 2021 12:13:14 +0200\0" "To\0Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>\0" - "Cc\0Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>" - Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> - virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + "Cc\0linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" markver@us.ibm.com Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - linux-s390@vger.kernel.org - " qemu-devel@nongnu.org\0" + qemu-devel@nongnu.org + Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org + Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> + " Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 04 2021, \"Michael S. Tsirkin\" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:\n" @@ -85,4 +85,4 @@ "status access, or feature bit handling without VERSION_1 being set is\n" neccessarily legacy? Does that really need special handling? -ec2a3cd1d7454cd00571f8fe8bb464a908f9619ad1e783ab71c0e266473be0c2 +edea519dece76f2939bedb98ccaf8f8ecf3bfbab8f5e74fc018777ed6473a675
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.