All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Atharva Raykar <raykar.ath@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Emily Shaffer" <emilyshaffer@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	"Shourya Shukla" <periperidip@gmail.com>,
	"Kaartic Sivaraam" <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>,
	"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	"Prathamesh Chavan" <pc44800@gmail.com>,
	"Đoàn Trần Công Danh" <congdanhqx@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael Silva" <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GSoC] [PATCH] submodule--helper: introduce add-config subcommand
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:50:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sg06tvab.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722112143.97944-1-raykar.ath@gmail.com>


On Thu, Jul 22 2021, Atharva Raykar wrote:

> +static void config_submodule_in_gitmodules(const char *name, const char *var, const char *value)
> +{
> +	char *key;
> +
> +	if (!is_writing_gitmodules_ok())
> +		die(_("please make sure that the .gitmodules file is in the working tree"));
> +
> +	key = xstrfmt("submodule.%s.%s", name, var);
> +	config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently(key, value);
> +	free(key);
> +}

Just a small point not per-se to do with this patch, but aren't all
callers of config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently() wanting to prefix
thigs with "submodule."? Looks like its API could be simplified a bit
with that xstrfmt() and free() inside that function.

> +static void configure_added_submodule(struct add_data *add_data)
> +{
> +	char *key, *submod_pathspec = NULL;
> +	struct child_process add_submod = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> +	struct child_process add_gitmodules = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> +	int pathspec_key_exists, activate = 0;

Usual style is to have different variables on different lines, unless
they're closely related (like "int i, j"), so "char *key;\n char
*submod[...]" in this case.

> +
> +	key = xstrfmt("submodule.%s.url", add_data->sm_name);
> +	git_config_set_gently(key, add_data->realrepo);
> +	free(key);
> +
> +	add_submod.git_cmd = 1;
> +	strvec_pushl(&add_submod.args, "add",
> +		     "--no-warn-embedded-repo", NULL);
> +	if (add_data->force)
> +		strvec_push(&add_submod.args, "--force");
> +	strvec_pushl(&add_submod.args, "--", add_data->sm_path, NULL);
> +
> +	if (run_command(&add_submod))
> +		die(_("Failed to add submodule '%s'"), add_data->sm_path);
> +
> +	config_submodule_in_gitmodules(add_data->sm_name, "path", add_data->sm_path);
> +	config_submodule_in_gitmodules(add_data->sm_name, "url", add_data->repo);
> +	if (add_data->branch)
> +		config_submodule_in_gitmodules(add_data->sm_name,
> +					       "branch", add_data->branch);
> +
> +	add_gitmodules.git_cmd = 1;
> +	strvec_pushl(&add_gitmodules.args,
> +		     "add", "--force", "--", ".gitmodules", NULL);
> +
> +	if (run_command(&add_gitmodules))
> +		die(_("Failed to register submodule '%s'"), add_data->sm_path);

Looks good at a glance.

> +	/*
> +	 * NEEDSWORK: In a multi-working-tree world this needs to be
> +	 * set in the per-worktree config.
> +	 */

So should we have a failing test for that scenario, or...? (Update: but
read ahead...)

> +static int add_config(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> +{
> +	int force = 0;
> +	struct add_data add_data = ADD_DATA_INIT;
> +
> +	struct option options[] = {
> +		OPT_STRING('b', "branch", &add_data.branch,
> +			   N_("branch"),
> +			   N_("branch of repository to store in "
> +			      "the submodule configuration")),
> +		OPT_STRING(0, "url", &add_data.repo,
> +			   N_("string"),
> +			   N_("url to clone submodule from")),
> +		OPT_STRING(0, "resolved-url", &add_data.realrepo,
> +			   N_("string"),
> +			   N_("url to clone the submodule from, after it has "
> +			      "been dereferenced relative to parent's url, "
> +			      "in the case where <url> is a relative url")),
> +		OPT_STRING(0, "path", &add_data.sm_path,
> +			   N_("path"),
> +			   N_("where the new submodule will be cloned to")),
> +		OPT_STRING(0, "name", &add_data.sm_name,
> +			   N_("string"),
> +			   N_("name of the new submodule")),
> +		OPT__FORCE(&force, N_("allow adding an otherwise ignored submodule path"),
> +			   PARSE_OPT_NOCOMPLETE),
> +		OPT_END()
> +	};
> +
> +	const char *const usage[] = {
> +		N_("git submodule--helper add-config "
> +		   "[--force|-f] [--branch|-b <branch>] "
> +		   "--url <url> --resolved-url <resolved-url> "
> +		   "--path <path> --name <name>"),
> +		NULL
> +	};

I'd say consider adding this as a "static" earlier in the file, but it's
an established pattern in this file, so let's keep it.

> +	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, usage, 0);

It's fine to omit it for a helper, but we're being non-pedantic about
checking mandatory options here. Would do it in a "real" built-in, but
for internal use it's fine.

> +	if (argc != 0)

Style: if (!argc)

> +		usage_with_options(usage, options);
> +
> +	add_data.force = !!force;
> +	configure_added_submodule(&add_data);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #define SUPPORT_SUPER_PREFIX (1<<0)
>  
>  struct cmd_struct {
> @@ -2949,6 +3073,7 @@ static struct cmd_struct commands[] = {
>  	{"name", module_name, 0},
>  	{"clone", module_clone, 0},
>  	{"add-clone", add_clone, 0},
> +	{"add-config", add_config, 0},
>  	{"update-module-mode", module_update_module_mode, 0},
>  	{"update-clone", update_clone, 0},
>  	{"ensure-core-worktree", ensure_core_worktree, 0},
> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh
> index 053daf3724..f713cb113c 100755
> --- a/git-submodule.sh
> +++ b/git-submodule.sh
> @@ -242,33 +242,7 @@ cmd_add()
>  	fi
>  
>  	git submodule--helper add-clone ${GIT_QUIET:+--quiet} ${force:+"--force"} ${progress:+"--progress"} ${branch:+--branch "$branch"} --prefix "$wt_prefix" --path "$sm_path" --name "$sm_name" --url "$realrepo" ${reference:+"$reference"} ${dissociate:+"--dissociate"} ${depth:+"$depth"} || exit
> -	git config submodule."$sm_name".url "$realrepo"
> -
> -	git add --no-warn-embedded-repo $force "$sm_path" ||
> -	die "fatal: $(eval_gettext "Failed to add submodule '\$sm_path'")"
> -
> -	git submodule--helper config submodule."$sm_name".path "$sm_path" &&
> -	git submodule--helper config submodule."$sm_name".url "$repo" &&
> -	if test -n "$branch"
> -	then
> -		git submodule--helper config submodule."$sm_name".branch "$branch"
> -	fi &&
> -	git add --force .gitmodules ||
> -	die "fatal: $(eval_gettext "Failed to register submodule '\$sm_path'")"
> -
> -	# NEEDSWORK: In a multi-working-tree world, this needs to be
> -	# set in the per-worktree config.

Ah, this is the NEEDSWORK comment, just copied to the C code...

> -	if git config --get submodule.active >/dev/null
> -	then
> -		# If the submodule being adding isn't already covered by the
> -		# current configured pathspec, set the submodule's active flag
> -		if ! git submodule--helper is-active "$sm_path"
> -		then
> -			git config submodule."$sm_name".active "true"
> -		fi
> -	else
> -		git config submodule."$sm_name".active "true"
> -	fi
> +	git submodule--helper add-config ${force:+--force} ${branch:+--branch "$branch"} --url "$repo" --resolved-url "$realrepo" --path "$sm_path" --name "$sm_name"
>  }
>  

Very nice to have this simplified.

Would be good to split this very long line across multiple lines
though...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-22 11:21 [GSoC] [PATCH] submodule--helper: introduce add-config subcommand Atharva Raykar
2021-07-22 11:41 ` Atharva Raykar
2021-07-22 11:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2021-07-22 13:28   ` Atharva Raykar
2021-07-22 13:31 ` Atharva Raykar
2021-07-23 20:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-24  9:59   ` Atharva Raykar
2021-07-28 11:53 ` [GSoC] [PATCH v2] " Atharva Raykar
2021-07-28 19:51   ` Kaartic Sivaraam
     [not found]     ` <d206fa7a-a450-552b-824c-518ee481c480@gmail.com>
2021-07-29 19:30       ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2021-07-30  6:22         ` Atharva Raykar
2021-08-01  6:33   ` [GSoC] [PATCH v3] " Atharva Raykar
2021-08-05 18:25     ` Kaartic Sivaraam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sg06tvab.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=congdanhqx@gmail.com \
    --cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
    --cc=pc44800@gmail.com \
    --cc=periperidip@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=raykar.ath@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.