From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910CC433DB for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89EC660235 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:36:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 89EC660235 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59158 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6cBo-0003uO-Ix for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:36:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6c9g-000207-Ec for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:34:26 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:28945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6c9c-0003O7-9s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:34:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612197256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ObxWY/aurmASZ+PpjeQYahak2MFh02zkxtAAfEUVFW0=; b=LDmL0HFZ2eAZk1fkNgQQ1RS+H3V5JcoEsVn1oOp+QvcSrE/91U9nDNEHkNYKZe7/ZMH7ue z1F67ZOxhqYtxVLOIpn0VTY6kf0T5adzQ1kqYqCG2O4BlvF+kHjSeDulkgSjOiGZwdhT+I c01eeNAnmPfKt1+Us35zgeZJw9BQFhk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-294-Kp4QF6-oMJeIyw-pLFDrlg-1; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:34:03 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Kp4QF6-oMJeIyw-pLFDrlg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24A11015C98; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-113-35.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.35]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F8A2B431; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:33:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] docs: add a table showing x86-64 ABI compatibility levels References: <20210201153606.4158076-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20210201153606.4158076-2-berrange@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 17:33:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210201153606.4158076-2-berrange@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:36:03 +0000") Message-ID: <87sg6foiha.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=fweimer@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=fweimer@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.351, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Cleber Rosa , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" * Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9: > and supported by GCC, CLang, GLibC and more. Clang and glibc are the official spellings, I think. > diff --git a/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv b/docs/system/cpu-models-= x86-abi.csv > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..4565e6a535 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv > +Icelake-Client,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85, > +Icelake-Client-noTSX,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85, > +Icelake-Client-v1,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85, > +Icelake-Client-v2,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85, Icelake Client supports x86-64-v4 according to Intel ARK and a quick test on a reference system. Have you defined it differently in QEMU? > +KnightsMill,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85, > +KnightsMill-v1,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85, This one is correct. Even though Knights Mill supports AVX-512, it does not cover the variants that are considered definitive for x86-64-v4. > +Skylake-Server,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85 > +Skylake-Server-IBRS,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85 > +Skylake-Server-noTSX-IBRS,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85 > +Skylake-Server-v1,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85 > +Skylake-Server-v2,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85 > +Skylake-Server-v3,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85 > +Skylake-Server-v4,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85,=E2=9C=85 This one is a little bit odd. Skylake Xeons which are not Xeon Scalable Processors exist, and they do not support x86-64-v4. Is this again a matter of different naming in QEMU? Thanks, Florian --=20 Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'N= eill