All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Michael Grzeschik <mgr@pengutronix.de>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	m.olbrich@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't dequeue requests on already disabled endpoints
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:18:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sghq2tum.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200329190244.GK27849@pengutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2421 bytes --]


Hi,

Michael Grzeschik <mgr@pengutronix.de> writes:
>> > dwc3_gadget_ep_disable gets called before the last request gets
>> > dequeued.
>> >
>> > In __dwc3_gadget_ep_disable all started, pending and cancelled
>> > lists for this endpoint will call dwc3_gadget_giveback in
>> > dwc3_remove_requests.
>> >
>> > After that no list containing the afterwards dequed request,
>> > therefor it is not necessary to run the dequeue routine.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > @Lars-Peter Clausen:
>> >
>> > This patch addresses the case that not queued requests get dequeued.
>> > The only case that this happens seems on disabling the gadget.
>> >
>> >  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 3 +++
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> > index 9a6f741d1db0dc..5d4fa8d6c93e49 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> > @@ -1609,6 +1609,9 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue(struct usb_ep *ep,
>> >  
>> >  	trace_dwc3_ep_dequeue(req);
>> >  
>> > +	if (!(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_ENABLED))
>> > +		return 0;
>> 
>> which driver is trying to call dequeue after the endpoint is disabled?
>> Got some tracepoints of the problem happening?
>
> I see the case when using uvc-gadget.
>
> Look into uvc_v4l2_release in uvc_v4l2.c:
>
> uvc_function_disconnect
>    composite_disconnect
>       reset_config
>          uvc_function_disable->usb_ep_disable
>
> uvcg_video_enable
>    usb_ep_dequeue
>       dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue

Oh, I see what you mean. We get a disconnect, which disables the
endpoints, which forces all requests to be dequeued. Now I remember why
this exists: we giveback the requests from disconnect because not all
gadget drivers will call usb_ep_dequeue() if simply told about the
disconnect. Then UDC drivers have to be a little more careful and make
sure that all requests are givenback.

In any case, why is it a problem to call usb_ep_dequeue()? Is it only
because of that dev_err()? We could just remove that message,
really. Eventually, I want to move more of this logic into UDC core so
udc drivers can be simplified. For that work, though, first we would
have to add a "generic" struct usb_ep_hw implementation and manage list
of requests as part of UDC core as well.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-30  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06 14:45 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Handle dequeuing of non queued URB gracefully Alexandru Ardelean
2019-11-12 14:41 ` Michael Olbrich
2020-01-16 11:12   ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-01-16 13:05     ` Felipe Balbi
2020-01-16 13:24 ` [PATCH][RESEND] " Alexandru Ardelean
2020-01-30 12:02   ` Felipe Balbi
2020-03-10 13:22     ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-03-10 13:45       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-03-10 14:07         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-03-27  8:43           ` [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't dequeue requests on already disabled endpoints Michael Grzeschik
2020-03-27  8:53             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-03-27 11:15               ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-27  9:14             ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-03-27 10:43               ` Michael Grzeschik
2020-03-27 10:55                 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-03-28  8:27             ` Felipe Balbi
2020-03-29 19:02               ` Michael Grzeschik
2020-03-30  7:18                 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2020-03-30  8:25                   ` Michael Grzeschik
2020-03-30 10:06                     ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sghq2tum.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=mgr@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.