From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZJfo-0003bb-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:00:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZJfl-0004HV-Gx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:00:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZJfl-0004EC-9E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:00:49 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80CE480F84 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <20181216140902.23986-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20181216140902.23986-8-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:00:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20181216140902.23986-8-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau"'s message of "Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:08:56 +0400") Message-ID: <87sgyud8ac.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/13] qapi: make s390 commands depend on TARGET_S390X List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau writes: > Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > Acked-by: Cornelia Huck > --- [...] > diff --git a/qapi/target.json b/qapi/target.json > index f277b69a2a..d751e1623a 100644 > --- a/qapi/target.json > +++ b/qapi/target.json > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ >=20=20 > { 'pragma': { 'top-unit': 'target' } } >=20=20 > +{ 'include': 'misc.json' } > + misc.json is a bit of a kitchen sink. I'd prefer not to include it here, but instead factor out the bits we actually need into a new .json. I suspect that would be an improvement all by itself. > ## > # @rtc-reset-reinjection: > # [...]