All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <87sh0b69hz.fsf@linaro.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index aac81b1..b23c865 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
 
 > On 7 November 2018 at 17:39, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
->> On 7 November 2018 at 17:10, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
+>> On 7 November 2018 at 17:10, Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
 >>> Not all faults handled by handle_exit are instruction emulations. For
 >>> example a ESR_ELx_EC_IABT will result in the page tables being updated
 >>> but the instruction that triggered the fault hasn't actually executed
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
 >>> seeing if kvm_arm_handle_step_debug wants to claim we stepped an
 >>> instruction.
 >>>
->>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
+>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
 >>
 >> What's the rationale for this change? Presumably it's fixing
 >> something, but the commit message doesn't really say what...
@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ engineering this was to expand arm_exit_handlers[] and tag each handler
 that was an instruction emulation and gate on that.
 
 --
-Alex Bennée
+Alex Benn?e
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 434fe20..76a2505 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,25 +1,17 @@
  "ref\020181107171031.22573-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org\0"
  "ref\0CAFEAcA8LL0uC6o1V3W2T=2P47xZ0zGhMR5mEE+x=8qwmDKZL_g@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\0CAFEAcA8mKCTeswpiznVWR3kSfVfjbot1aTSfemFVNjzXYdSJwA@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "From\0Alex Benn\303\251e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: arm64: don't single-step for non-emulated faults\0"
+ "From\0alex.bennee@linaro.org (Alex Benn\303\251e)\0"
+ "Subject\0[RFC PATCH] KVM: arm64: don't single-step for non-emulated faults\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:26:16 +0000\0"
- "To\0Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>\0"
- "Cc\0kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>"
-  arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
-  kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
-  Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-  Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-  Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-  Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
- " open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "\n"
  "Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:\n"
  "\n"
  "> On 7 November 2018 at 17:39, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:\n"
- ">> On 7 November 2018 at 17:10, Alex Benn\303\251e <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:\n"
+ ">> On 7 November 2018 at 17:10, Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:\n"
  ">>> Not all faults handled by handle_exit are instruction emulations. For\n"
  ">>> example a ESR_ELx_EC_IABT will result in the page tables being updated\n"
  ">>> but the instruction that triggered the fault hasn't actually executed\n"
@@ -27,7 +19,7 @@
  ">>> seeing if kvm_arm_handle_step_debug wants to claim we stepped an\n"
  ">>> instruction.\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> Signed-off-by: Alex Benn\303\251e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>\n"
+ ">>> Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> What's the rationale for this change? Presumably it's fixing\n"
  ">> something, but the commit message doesn't really say what...\n"
@@ -52,6 +44,6 @@
  "that was an instruction emulation and gate on that.\n"
  "\n"
  "--\n"
- "Alex Benn\303\251e"
+ Alex Benn?e
 
-5480932a06427da92e6b2cd94e059ec120f82b57a33745f02327b63c06e7e095
+a23e5da250a65a496eebdcaf891c7a096253539f0a159f8f524b8b6d11041afa

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.